VCE · Text Response
Text Response: How does Johnson explore different…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 75%: How does Johnson explore different perceptions of truth in High Ground? Perceptions of truth can differ based on…
How does Johnson explore different perceptions of truth in High Ground?
Perceptions of truth can differ based on personal beliefs, morals, and experiences, often reflecting an individuals persona. In High Ground, Stephan Maxwell Johnson illustrates different perceptions of truth, that may influence one’s behaviours and morals. Ultimately, Johnson contends that truth is not only a matter of perception, implying not all versions of the truth are reality.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: born a crime
VCE Text Response essay scoring 75%: Through an introspective lens of his personal experiences in the racially segregated communities of pre/post…
Through an introspective lens of his personal experiences in the racially segregated communities of pre/post apartheid, Trevor Noah’s memoir, Born a crime, reveals the long-lasting influence of systematic oppression in South Africa and the resilience needed to endure its harsh conditions. By exploring this idea, Noah expresses that relationships built upon apartheid’s difficult circumstances mainly provide virtuous benefits, however, on the contrary some relationships have a non-virtuous influence. Specifically, Noah champions relationships built on hardship as it can forge resilience. Furthermore, Noah highlights that an individual's relationship with language and culture has the capacity to foster the development of one's identity. Contrastingly, Noah criticizes abusive relationships that are motivated by circumstances of apartheid as ultimately destructive.
VCE · Creative Response
Creative Response: section b stimulus 'Stepping up'…
VCE Creative Response essay scoring 87.5%: There I lay surrendered to my injuries. The steady drip of the IV faltered, leaving a heavy stillness in its…
There I lay surrendered to my injuries. The steady drip of the IV faltered, leaving a heavy stillness in its wake. The ghost of anguish from the Myeong Dong strip, left to whisper in my ear. The silence was deafening. My body, paralyzed, glued to the sterile hospital bed. I was left to sink into the thin padding, the bed of my fate. A brutal reality check in the wake of the courageous act to push out my chest and be the one to step up. The one to complete the last of the building blocks of our ancestors. The people who built this nation. This was my time. However, instead my mind was left in ruin from the merciless truth of my choice to take action. An inspired young mind, fueled by the hope of our community motto “Be the one who makes a difference” rung out amid the mix of tear gas explosion and the thud of batons.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: How does Shakespeare explore…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 80%: In Twelfth Night, Shakespeare presents self-deception as an inherently human tendency to reshape reality according…
In Twelfth Night, Shakespeare presents self-deception as an inherently human tendency to reshape reality according to personal desires. Within Illyria’s festive disorder, individuals construct fantasies to escape uncomfortable truths and pursue more desirable realities. Although these illusions offer temporary pleasure and emotional security, Shakespeare exposes the dangers of allowing desire to overpower rational judgement. Ultimately, the play suggests that genuine fulfilment requires confronting the distinction between appearance and reality, yet the consequences of self-deception cannot always be undone.
Shakespeare initially explores self-deception as a means of indulging romantic fantasies rather than confronting reality. Orsino’s declaration, “If music be the food of love, play on”, employs a metaphor that portrays love as an appetite he continually feeds. The imperative “play on” reveals his desire to prolong his emotional indulgence, suggesting he is more invested in the experience of being in love than genuinely understanding Olivia. His admission that “so full of shapes is fancy” further acknowledges the instability of romantic desire, as the metaphor of “shapes” presents love as a construction of the imagination. Similarly, Olivia asks, “Even so quickly may one catch the plague?”, using disease imagery to convey how her sudden attraction to Cesario overwhelms rational judgement. Despite knowing little about Cesario, she constructs an imagined relationship around her desires. Through both characters, Shakespeare suggests that self-deception provides emotional escape by allowing individuals to transform uncertain reality into a more appealing fantasy; however, this pleasure depends upon their willingness to disregard the truth.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: “Jane Eyre's greatest achievement is her…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 90%: Set against the backdrop of nineteenth-century Victorian England, Charlotte Brontë’s 1847 iconoclastic…
Set against the backdrop of nineteenth-century Victorian England, Charlotte Brontë’s 1847 iconoclastic bildungsroman Jane Eyre interrogates the complex tensions between individual identity, morality and the rigid patriarchal structures of society. Through the psychological and emotional development of her unconventional heroine, Brontë challenges the entrenched class hierarchies and restrictive social conventions that govern individual experience. While Jane's refusal to surrender her independence constitutes a defining achievement, Brontë ultimately suggests that her greatest triumph lies in reconciling personal autonomy with moral integrity and authentic human connection. Initially, Brontë explores Jane's resistance to social and patriarchal oppression, revealing how the preservation of independence is fundamental to her developing identity. Furthermore, she examines Jane's refusal to compromise her autonomy in pursuit of romantic fulfilment, illuminating the moral sacrifices necessary to preserve individual self-respect. Ultimately, Brontë presents Jane's attainment of an equitable and fulfilling marriage, suggesting that genuine happiness emerges not through independence alone, but through its reconciliation with mutual affection and equality.
VCE · Creative Response
Creative Response: 2024 Vce Framework 2: using the title…
VCE Creative Response essay scoring 100%: Resist and Persist Despite being discriminated against and dismissed, young people continue to express their…
Resist and Persist
Despite being discriminated against and dismissed, young people continue to express their opinions and challenge establishments, refusing the pressure of political powerlessness falling onto them.
One of the primary motivators for citizens to unite and protest is the ability to make their stance known and ensure politicians recognise their collective disagreement. When institutions are attempting to actively dismiss or make individuals opinions appear redundant, protest becomes a mechanism that people turn to in hopes to rebel against the establishment and assert their dominance. Across France, in September 2026, students abandoned their classrooms and took to the streets, demanding political leaders confront the failures in the educational system that is meant to secure their future. Their protest exposes a troubling contradiction: those who are constantly neglected and hold the least institutional authority are increasingly compelled to demand change from those who possess it.
Protest often emerges when formal democratic participation becomes limited. For young people, whose political influence is constrained by age and the lack of respect by leaders, collective action becomes a substitute form of participation. When young people gather in public, they actively rebel against the forced ideology of being politically powerless, and transform dissent into visibility, pressuring institutions to respond. When the youth assert their presence, they signify more than physical location; it is a declaration of political recognition and empowerment, through their democratic rights of expression and assembly. Consequently, despite lacking authoritative power, protest enables young individuals to exert meaningful pressure onto establishments, who often ignore this collective voice at their political peril.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: You're in their backyard By Millie…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 70%: Section C — Student's latest handwritten response Analysis of You're in their backyard The widespread issue…
Section C — Student's latest handwritten response
Analysis of You're in their backyard
The widespread issue surrounding traveller's behaviours and their effects on the Australian ecosystem has become increasingly relevant. In her article “You're in their backyard”, published on the travel-centred website Hit the Road, writer Millie Anderson condemns reckless traveller behaviours, and champions for a more considerate, prepared and kinder travelling mindset. Initially Anderson appeals to Australian travel enthusiasts through an anecdotal and appreciative tone, before transitioning to a more critical and condemnatory tone to showcase their effects on wildlife and humans alike, ultimately using a sardonic tone and urging argument to demand action. Aiming to inform travellers in Australia about the impact of their behaviour and to incite meaningful change.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: ‘Foolery, sir, does walk about the orb…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 75%: William Shakespeare’s comedic play, ‘Twelfth Night’, set in the hierarchical and patriarchal society of Illyria,…
William Shakespeare’s comedic play, ‘Twelfth Night’, set in the hierarchical and patriarchal society of Illyria, demonstrates disruption to social conventions, particularly those surrounding gender, and social hierarchy. Through the interplay of love, deception, misperception, pride, and ambition Shakespeare illustrates how emotion and self-interest can compromise an individual’s rational judgement, rendering individuals susceptible to foolish behaviour. However, Shakespeare presents foolishness as a force which could also result in wisdom and psychological growth. Beyond individual foolishness, this behaviour challenges rigid social conventions and facilitate emotional maturity, exploring and exposing both the limitations and transformative potential of human nature. Ultimately, Shakespeare presents foolishness as an intrinsic aspect of human nature, revealing how emotion, self-interest and disguise undermine rational judgement, while suggesting that recognising human foolishness can expose social hypocrisy and create opportunities for self-awareness.
Through the use of desire, Shakespeare questions whether love can compromise an individual’s rational judgement and render an individual susceptible to foolish behaviour. Malvolio’s “self-love” causes him to fall in love with the idea of Olivia, to become “Count Malvolio”. His love causes Malvolio to become susceptible to gullings through the inability to apply logic and reason to the situation. By exploiting Malvolio’s ambition, the forged letter convinces him that he may be destined for greatness; the declaration that “Some are born great, some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon them” spurs on Malvolio to continue his fantasies. The dramatic irony of Olivia’s disdain of Malvolio underscores how his pride and desire for social advancement cloud his judgement, rendering him inevitably susceptible to manipulation as Shakespeare exposes the universal human tendency to let ambition override rational thought. Additionally, the Elizabethan styled social hierarchy would never allow for the marriage between a servant, Malvolio, and a noble, Olivia, without some ridicule and reputational damage. However, Malvolio does not apply this logic and continues to believe that Olivia loves him, to the extent that when the letter asks him to wear “yellow stockings” and “cross garter” he does. This not only demonstrates his inability to apply sense to the actions he undertakes in pursuit of power and love but also how it pushes people to become “mad” and foolish. As a result, Olivia describes Malvolio’s behaviour as “mid-summer madness” emphasising how abnormal the way Malvolio is dressed compared to society’s expectations. Unlike Malvolio’s self-love, Antonio’s pure love for Sebastian, Viola’s twin brother, also leaves him vulnerable and unable to apply reason and logic. When he first arrives in Illyria with Sebastian, Antonino vows to help Sebastian even though it would be better for his own safety to leave, underlining how emotional attachment can override rational judgement, illustrating that human foolishness is inevitable when devotion compels individuals to act against own self-interest. This not only shows how love can blur the lines between rational and irrational decisions just to keep someone they “admire” safe but also how someone would be foolish enough to walk into danger, demonstrating how Antonio is putting Sebastian’s safety well before his own.
Through dramatic irony and farcical comedy, Shakespeare further explores how self-deception manifests across social strata, as Olivia’s infatuation with Cesario demonstrates how love can distort rational judgement and render even those of high social standing vulnerable to foolish behaviour. Viola’s disguise as the “eunuch” Cesario, causes Olivia to be perceived by the audience as foolish for pursuing Cesario. This is because not only were same sex marriages looked unfavourably upon but also the fact that Olivia is taking a male role in the pursuit of love, is going against society’s gender expectations. Additionally, she is also perceived to be foolish for spending “seven years” as a “veiled” “cloistress” in the light of her father’s and brother’s deaths. It is perceived by the Elizabethan audience as excessive, and when she starts falling in love with Cesario, contradictory to Olivia’s original intent to be a “veiled” “cloistress”. Hence by falling in love with Cesario she is positioned to be foolish. Further her love for Cesario’s features, fools her in marrying Sebastian, thinking it was Cesario, causing farcical comedy for the audience. It also restores order which comes with the marriages of Viola and Duke Orsino, Olivia and Sebastian. Therefore, Shakespeare comments on how love can inevitably make people blind to reality and reason.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: Ogawa presents a world in which hope is…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 80%: Yoko Ogawa's novel, "The Memory Police" acts as a commentary on the benign nature of ideological conditioning as…
Yoko Ogawa's novel, "The Memory Police" acts as a commentary on the benign nature of ideological conditioning as deployed by an authoritarian government to control a populace. In particular, the novel passes judgement on society's readily compliance towards extreme oppression, depriving them of hope to dispel said compliancce. Therefore, Ogawa laments the insidious nature of the Memory Police's control and how it leads to the seamless indoctrination of a populace. Yet, despite society's inability to conjure hope in the face of oppression, Ogawa suggests that many forms of resistance may still arise in retaliation.
Firstly, Ogawa explores how the gradual accumulation of authoritarian power by the Memory Police renders their oppression benign yet destructive. In particular, through the progression of objects being "disappeared" to the eventual corporeal "disappearances", Ogawa adopts a linear narrative structure intended to display the encroaching control of the Memory Police. Similarly, by aligning the citizens' eroding ability to "recall the things... lost on the island" with the typist's losing voice and thereby, self-expression, Ogawa accentuates the citizen's inability to perceive the adverse effects of memory erasure on their identity. This ruthless smothering of rememberance is further reinforced when the Memory Police is occupying a "building" that had once been a "theatre". Serving as a microcosmic symbol of culture, the neutralisation from "theatre" to "building" represents the abolishment of creative expression and individuality subjected upon the citizens. With the admission that the Memory Police's control would expand by their occupying of the "library" as well, Ogawa foreshadows the insidious and restrained nature of the Memory Police's control on creative liberty. In doing so, Ogawa warns against the moral and ethical decay that results from implicit oppression, demonstrating the ways in which it can lead to a misguided reverence of authority that leaves a society devoid of hope against enforced erasure. Thus, Ogawa critiques the silent impact of totalitarianism in relation to memory erasure, and how it leads to a mentally collapsed society.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: Ogawa presents a world in which hope is…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 77.5%: Yoko Ogawa's novel, "The Memory Police" acts as a commentary on the benign nature of ideological conditioning as…
Yoko Ogawa's novel, "The Memory Police" acts as a commentary on the benign nature of ideological conditioning as deployed by an authoritarian government to control a populace. In particular, the novel passes down judgement on society's lack of hope to resist against extreme oppression, depriving them of the ability to perceive the dangers of said oppression. Therefore, Ogawa laments the insidious nature of the Memory Police's control and how it leads to the seamless indoctrination of a populace. Yet, despite society's inability to conjure hope in the face of oppression, Ogawa suggests that many forms of resistance may still arise in retaliation.
Firstly, Ogawa explores how the gradual accumulation of authoritarian power by the Memory Police renders their oppression benign yet destructive. In particular, through the progression of objects being "disappeared" to the eventual corporeal "disappearances", Ogawa adopts a linear narrative structure intended to display the encroaching control of the Memory Police. Similarly, by aligning the citizens' eroding ability to "recall the things... lost on the island" with the typist's losing voice and thereby, self-expression, Ogawa accentuates the citizen's inability to perceive the adverse effects of memory erasure on their identity. This ruthless smothering of rememberance is further reinforced when the Memory Police is occupying a "building" that had once been a "theatre". Serving as a microcosmic symbol of culture, the neutralisation from "theatre" to "building" represents the abolishment of creative expression and individuality subjected upon the citizens. With the admission that the Memory Police's control would expand by their occupying of the "library" as well, Ogawa foreshadows the insidious and restrained nature of the Memory Police's control on creative liberty. In doing so, Ogawa warns against the moral and ethical decay that results from implicit oppression, demonstrating the ways in which it can lead to a misguided reverence of authority that leaves a society devoid of hope against enforced erasure. Thus, Ogawa critiques the silent impact of totalitarianism in relation to memory erasure, and how it leads to a mentally collapsed society.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: In Twelfth Night, deception is the primary…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 72.5%: In Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, deception is often viewed by the characters as a protective mask or a tool to…
In Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, deception is often viewed by the characters as a protective mask or a tool to achieve their desires. However, Shakespeare argues that these illusions do not resolve conflict; instead, they act as a destructive trap. By examining the experiences of Viola, Orsino, and Malvolio, it becomes clear that deception is the primary cause of suffering because it forces characters to lose touch with their true selves and their reality.
Viola’s use of deception is initially a survival tactic, yet it creates deep internal suffering. By disguising herself as Cesario, she adopts a new identity that allows her to navigate Illyria, but this mask prevents her from expressing her true feelings for Orsino. As she states, "I am not what I am," she acknowledges the split within herself. Her deception forces her into a state of emotional chaos where she must serve the man she loves while watching him pursue someone else. While she believes the disguise protects her, it actually traps her in a cycle of repression, proving that deception causes her personal anguish.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: In We Have Always Lived in the Castle,…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 87.5%: In Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle, guilt and innocence are presented as unstable concepts…
In Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle, guilt and innocence are presented as unstable concepts shaped by secrecy, social judgement and the desire for self-preservation. Rather than portraying morality as a simple distinction between right and wrong, Jackson exposes the contradiction between how individuals understand their own actions and how society judges them. Through the contrast between the village’s hostility and the sisters’ secluded existence, Jackson challenges the assumption that public opinion reliably identifies guilt. However, the novel also complicates the sisters’ apparent victimhood, revealing that their desire for security can obscure their own capacity for wrongdoing. Through Gothic conventions, an unreliable first-person narrator and the symbolism of the Blackwood home, Jackson ultimately questions whether innocence can exist independently of the stories people construct to protect themselves.
Jackson initially challenges the relationship between innocence and social judgement by revealing how easily collective hostility can replace genuine moral understanding. Following the poisoning of the Blackwood family, the surviving sisters become targets of the village’s suspicion and resentment. Rather than allowing grief or uncertainty to produce compassion, the community transforms the family tragedy into a source of public fascination and punishment. The villagers’ hostility demonstrates how social groups can construct their own version of guilt, treating exclusion as justification for cruelty. This reversal complicates the distinction between victim and perpetrator: although the sisters are associated with a genuine tragedy, the villagers’ behaviour reveals that those who condemn wrongdoing are not necessarily morally innocent themselves. Jackson’s Gothic portrayal of the hostile village intensifies this moral uncertainty, positioning the outside world as a threatening force rather than a reliable source of justice. Through this contrast, Jackson criticises the hypocrisy of a society that claims moral authority while participating in collective cruelty. Nevertheless, the sisters’ suffering does not automatically establish their innocence, encouraging readers to question the difference between being unjustly persecuted and being entirely free from guilt.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: To what extent does Twelfth Night suggest…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 85%: William Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’ explores the consequences of tragedy and assumed loss. Throughout the play,…
William Shakespeare’s ‘Twelfth Night’ explores the consequences of tragedy and assumed loss. Throughout the play, he specifically dives into the result of foolishness and wisdom through various characters and what they are confronted with. The playwright portrays foolishness and wisdom, but also exposes the true character within several figures. By examining the hypocrisy of noble characters, exposing the ultimate fools in the play, and revealing true wisdom, Shakespeare showcases the self-awareness of some roles, and demonstrates that the characteristics of some are not always what they appear to be.
VCE · Creative Response
Creative Response: Title: ‘The Cost of Silence’
VCE Creative Response essay scoring 90%: The Cost of Silence 2.6 million girls. Not 2.6 million statistics. Not 2.6 million numbers on a page. 2.6…
The Cost of Silence
2.6 million girls. Not 2.6 million statistics. Not 2.6 million numbers on a page. 2.6 million futures interrupted.
According to UNICEF, more than 2.6 million Afghan girls have been denied secondary education since 2021, following the Taliban's return to power. <Cite refs={["turn377924search3"]}/>
Let that number sit with you for a moment.
Behind every number is a girl who may have wanted to become a doctor, a teacher, an engineer. A girl who once walked into a classroom believing her future was hers to shape, only to discover that the world had made a decision about it for her.
And what is the cost of taking away a girl's education?
We might measure it in lost qualifications, lost opportunities, lost income. But how do we measure the cost of a dream someone is forbidden to pursue?
How do you calculate the price of a voice the world refuses to hear?
In Afghanistan, the answer is not found in a textbook. It is written into the lives of girls who have been told that their education must end, while their ambitions are expected to disappear with it.
But ambition does not disappear simply because permission is withdrawn.
And neither does protest.
We often mistake protest for noise: crowds filling streets, fists raised, voices joined in a single demand. Yet protest can begin long before a crowd gathers. It can begin with a girl who continues to learn, a woman who refuses to surrender her beliefs, or a community that quietly protects the possibility of a different future.
Resistance does not always announce itself. Sometimes, it survives in the spaces power attempts to close.
Of course, we must not romanticise this resistance. Afghan women should not have to be extraordinary simply to access an education. They should not have to demonstrate courage to claim what ought to be theirs by right. To praise their resilience without questioning the restrictions imposed upon them is to admire the strength of people while ignoring the burden placed on their shoulders.
And yet, we must recognise their courage, because courage exposes the weakness of a system that fears an educated girl.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: In Ghost Wall, fear is more powerful than…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 87.5%: Much of human behaviour is governed by fear, as individuals often sacrifice their autonomy in an attempt to…
Much of human behaviour is governed by fear, as individuals often sacrifice their autonomy in an attempt to conform to established systems of authority. Throughout her novella Ghost Wall, Sarah Moss exposes how fear becomes a powerful mechanism of coercive control, enabling oppressive individuals to exert authority beyond the immediate threat of physical violence. Moss further challenges the assumption that silence signifies willing submission, revealing how sustained psychological intimidation conditions individuals to internalise oppression, while the passivity of bystanders allows such authority to persist. Ultimately, however, Moss suggests that although physical violence reinforces oppressive hierarchies, it is the fear of its recurrence that sustains them, demonstrating that meaningful resistance requires both the rejection of internalised beliefs and the willingness of others to challenge injustice.
Moss initially presents fear as a mechanism through which individuals establish and maintain oppressive authority, revealing how the anticipation of violence can become more psychologically restrictive than violence itself. Through Bill's glorification of Iron Age traditions, Moss exposes how his desire to reconstruct historical hierarchies reflects his own insecurity and need for dominance. Silvie's observation that her father "wanted his own ancestry, wanted a lineage, a claim on something" reveals, through the repetition of "wanted", his desperation to establish a sense of authority and belonging. However, his fascination with the past becomes a means of legitimising his oppressive behaviour, demonstrated through his conditional threat that "as long as you're living under my roof you'll behave yourself or else". The unfinished warning "or else" establishes the constant possibility of punishment, illustrating how Bill's authority depends upon Silvie's anticipation of violence rather than its continuous enactment. This psychological domination is intensified through Silvie's first-person narration, which provides readers with intimate access to the consequences of sustained intimidation. Moss's depiction of "anxiety rising in [her] like water in a jug" employs a simile of accumulating pressure to convey the overwhelming nature of Silvie's psychological distress. Through the subjective narrative perspective, Moss exposes how Bill's authority has become embedded within Silvie's consciousness, demonstrating how oppressive power persists even in his absence. Ultimately, Moss reveals that while physical violence establishes Bill's capacity to intimidate, it is the internalisation of fear that enables his authority to endure.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: “You with your precious eyes, you're blind…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 90%: In Oedipus the King, Sophocles explores the limitations of human knowledge through the recurring motif of sight and…
In Oedipus the King, Sophocles explores the limitations of human knowledge through the recurring motif of sight and blindness, challenging the assumption that physical perception and intellectual ability guarantee genuine understanding. Although Oedipus is revered for his intelligence and ability to solve the Sphinx's riddle, his confidence in his own capabilities ultimately conceals his ignorance of his identity and the circumstances governing his life. Through the juxtaposition of Oedipus' physical sight with Tiresias' prophetic insight, Sophocles exposes the dangers of human arrogance, revealing how pride can obstruct the recognition of uncomfortable truths. Ultimately, Oedipus' tragic downfall demonstrates that genuine self-knowledge may only emerge through painful recognition, as Sophocles challenges humanity's presumption that it can fully comprehend its own existence.
Sophocles initially establishes the distinction between physical sight and genuine understanding through his contrasting characterisation of Oedipus and Tiresias. As the ruler of Thebes, Oedipus is celebrated for his intelligence, having previously liberated the city from the Sphinx through his capacity for reason. Consequently, he approaches the investigation into Laius' murder with confidence in his ability to identify the source of Thebes' suffering. However, this confidence is undermined when Tiresias, despite his physical blindness, possesses knowledge of the truth that remains inaccessible to Oedipus. Tiresias' accusation, “You with your precious eyes, you're blind to the corruption of your life,” establishes a paradox that challenges the relationship between perception and understanding. The juxtaposition of Oedipus' “precious eyes” with his figurative blindness exposes the inadequacy of his reliance on physical perception and intellectual confidence. Furthermore, Sophocles employs dramatic irony to position the audience ahead of Oedipus in recognising the significance of Tiresias' revelation, exposing the disparity between the king's perceived knowledge and his actual ignorance. While Oedipus believes his intelligence enables him to uncover the truth, his inability to recognise his own identity demonstrates that human reason cannot necessarily overcome the limitations of individual understanding. Through this contrast, Sophocles cautions against equating intellectual ability with wisdom, suggesting that human beings may remain profoundly ignorant of the realities governing their lives despite their apparent superiority.
VCE · Creative Response
Creative Response: title: "I belong" stimulus is image of…
VCE Creative Response essay scoring 100%: I Belong Pop's hands shake a little now when he holds anything small, so for the last month I have been the…
I Belong
Pop's hands shake a little now when he holds anything small, so for the last month I have been the one who holds the photographs.
The box came out of the wardrobe on Saturday, a shoebox gone soft at the corners and tied shut with a bootlace. I tipped it onto the kitchen table and the pictures slid out in a fan: black and white, curled at the edges, every one of them a landscape. A river with a bridge. A hillside cut into steps. A pear tree standing alone in a field like someone waiting for a bus. Not one person in any of them.
"Where's everybody?" I said.
"Behind the camera," said Pop. "Somebody had to hold it."
I have never been to the place in these photographs. I have heard its name my whole life, the way you hear the name of a distant cousin, worn and fond, and I have never once been able to picture it. At school I am the one who gets asked where I'm really from. I say here, and they say no, before that, and I have nothing in my hands to answer with. Now it lay across the tablecloth in greys, smelling of cardboard and old dust and something faintly sweet, like pressed fruit.
"New rule," Pop said. "Whoever's holding it tells it."
"I don't know any of them."
"Then I'll hold, you listen. Next one, you hold, I listen. Fair?"
He took the first photograph in both hands, careful, like carrying water.
"That goat," he said, "ate my father's hat. Twice."
"Twice?"
"He didn't learn the first time. Neither did the goat."
He told me about the hat, and then the bridge in the second picture, which the river took every spring "like a tax," and which the whole village rebuilt every spring, grumbling, out of the same stones. He told me which slope the pears grew on, and how the soil there was so red it stained your boots for a week, and how in October the entire hillside smelled of jam. And somewhere around the pear tree I realised I could see it: the red earth, the stained boots, the jam. I could see a place I had never stood in.
VCE · Creative Response
Creative Response: Moving Forward
VCE Creative Response essay scoring 90%: Crafting texts SAC - Moving Forward Paper stands alone on the desk, blankly staring back at me, expecting a…
Crafting texts SAC - Moving Forward
Paper stands alone on the desk, blankly staring back at me, expecting a response to the few words written on its surface.
"Step one"
Nothing follows it, however. It waits and waits. Pen gripped in my hand, gently grazing the page, yet not once does it touch it. It itches to make its mark, to dance upon the lines with letters that dictate what I will do with my life. The truth is, I'm stuck. I have "Step one" ready to go, but what happens now? I try to mutter up any idea I can.
Steps, these are typically as simple as following a recipe. A cup of flour enters the bowl, followed by 2 eggs; these come under their own, individual steps. See, so simple. Silence dances along the walls of the room. No rustling of paper, no pen scratching the empty page, no ink vocalising across the page.
I've always known life to be similar to that of a recipe. From a young age it has been represented as such to me. Basically, life has steps. This way of thinking, engraved into me from my earliest days, it never seemed wrong. It was obviously a naive version however. The grass' fresh scent travelled through my sense of smell, the warm embrace of the sun, glittering across me at recess; this moment is where I announced I will become a princess, and I knew what I had to do!
Step one, wear a dress. Step two, live in a castle.
Steps, it is what I have structured myself around since I believed I could truly become a princess. Although naive, it still relied on that fundamental belief. That's why I have stuck with it. Yet, in this moment at my page, the structure hasn't made itself known, which confuses me.
I truly believed that the steps would reveal themselves.
Voices littered the room, some high & loud, or some whispering, nonetheless, the room filled with sounds. The room is filled with year 11s like myself, my classmates, it even features a few year 10s. We have all picked this subject for VCE. I'm excited, I like this subject, it seems important for my future. The teacher begins.
"Let's hear from all of you!" She is asking us to share. Share our excitement for the future, what is the job we would like to pursue.
A wave of fear shoots through my system, job?
I know I will be working in the future, its how life goes, but I realise in that moment that answers will float around the room, moving like clockwork from classmate to the next, and by the time I am due to answer, nothing will come out. The feeling disappears, I relax. Theres a plan. University. Theres my answer, I knew that. It's fine that I'm not exactly sure of what will come after, but I have faith in my structure, things will fold out under each other and steps will follow. Once the words leave my mouth, it feels fine, even the teacher responds affirmatively; any lingering worry erases from my body.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: In Ghost Wall, fear is more powerful than…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 87.5%: Much of human behaviour is governed by fear, as individuals often sacrifice their autonomy in an attempt to…
Much of human behaviour is governed by fear, as individuals often sacrifice their autonomy in an attempt to conform to established systems of authority. Throughout her novella Ghost Wall, Sarah Moss exposes how fear becomes a powerful mechanism of coercive control, enabling oppressive individuals to exert authority beyond the immediate threat of physical violence. Moss further challenges the assumption that silence signifies willing submission, revealing how sustained psychological intimidation conditions individuals to internalise oppression, while the passivity of bystanders allows such authority to persist. Ultimately, however, Moss suggests that although physical violence reinforces oppressive hierarchies, it is the fear of its recurrence that sustains them, demonstrating that meaningful resistance requires both the rejection of internalised beliefs and the willingness of others to challenge injustice.
Moss initially presents fear as a mechanism through which individuals establish and maintain oppressive authority, revealing how the anticipation of violence can become more psychologically restrictive than violence itself. Through Bill's glorification of Iron Age traditions, Moss exposes how his desire to reconstruct historical hierarchies reflects his own insecurity and need for dominance. Silvie's observation that her father "wanted his own ancestry, wanted a lineage, a claim on something" reveals, through the repetition of "wanted", the desperation underlying his nostalgic attachment to the past. Rather than representing a genuine appreciation of history, Bill's fascination becomes a means of compensating for his perceived powerlessness within contemporary society. His authoritarian tendencies are further demonstrated through the conditional threat that "as long as you're living under my roof you'll behave yourself or else", where the unfinished warning "or else" establishes the constant possibility of punishment. By leaving the consequences unspoken, Moss illustrates how Bill's authority depends upon Silvie's anticipation of violence rather than its continuous physical enactment. This psychological domination is intensified through Silvie's stream-of-consciousness narration, which provides readers with intimate access to the internal consequences of sustained intimidation. Moss's depiction of "anxiety rising in [her] like water in a jug" employs a simile of accumulating pressure to convey the overwhelming nature of Silvie's psychological distress. The imagery of a gradually filling vessel suggests that fear is neither temporary nor confined to moments of physical confrontation, but instead becomes an inescapable presence within her consciousness. Through the subjective first-person narrative perspective, Moss exposes how Bill's authority has become embedded within Silvie's internal thought processes, demonstrating how oppressive power persists even in his absence. Consequently, Moss reveals that while physical violence establishes Bill's capacity to intimidate, its enduring psychological consequences enable his authority to persist without constant physical enforcement. Through this distinction, Moss exposes how coercive power becomes most destructive when individuals are conditioned to regulate their own behaviour through fear.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: How does Stephen Maxwell Johnson expose…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 85%: Stephen Maxwell Johnson's portrayal film "High Ground": Was set during the frontier wars in Australia, Amidst a…
Stephen Maxwell Johnson's portrayal film "High Ground": Was set during the frontier wars in Australia, Amidst a devasting time of discriminated colonisation and released in 2020; the film reflects on the suffering of the indigenous culture amongst the massacres. Directed towards those Australian citizens unaware of the brutality, Johnson sharply unveils the extreme penalties as a result of domination. The director utilises cinematography such as sound, camera angles and lighting to explain his gaze on abuse of power, pride and greed and how it effects colonialism.
Johnson illustrates that exploiting moral hierarchy can often lead to heavy sanctions. The director juxtaposits the roles of the leaders and matches each’s intent with their resulting fate. During the mediation between the two leaders, the colonisers have a background of the East Alligator mission, whereas the indigenous have a background of the forest which is displayed with a wide body shot. Johnson leads with this to dictate the differences in the perceptions of country, where the colonisers view country as building over colony; the indigenous use "mother nature" and "father sky" as their advantage. In consequence, Moran uses his hat as a symbol of the king in order to create a sense of fear; Johnson shows this use of intimidation to display the wrongful usage of power and foreshadow an intent of disobeying "Makarrata." At the end of the movie, in search for colonialism, Moran gets shot in the chest, with this Johnson silently shows that Moran has "a hole in his chest" with wrongful intentions and an absence of empathy. Overall the director utilises these techniques to show the unaware audience that abusing any heirachy for bad intentions lead to penalties, where domination is involved. Furthermore, Johnson explains that abusing power can result in consequences.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: How does 'The Memory Police' convey the…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 70%: Providing a commentary on the rise of fascism within modern democracies, Yoko Ogawa’s 1994 dystopian novel, ‘The…
Providing a commentary on the rise of fascism within modern democracies, Yoko Ogawa’s 1994 dystopian novel, ‘The Memory Police,’ explores an unnamed island where objects, words and people disappear mysteriously, shaping a society characterised by loss. Ogawa’s novel depicts memory as the single, most important aspect in shaping what it means to be human. Through deliberate construction, Ogawa shapes memory as the underpinning base of human identity and connection, therefore condemning the loss of memory as it consequently leads to the loss of purpose.
Ogawa’s novel illustrates the dire connection between memory and individual identity. Ogawa explores this connection through disappearing objects, each missing item causes the Narrator’s heart to become “more diluted and full of holes.” Whilst in western cultures, hearts normally have associations with romance and love, however in Japanese culture they represent the soul, and the individual’s thoughts, emotions and idea’s. Therefore Ogawa symbolises the importance of memories in shaping one’s identity, as the loss of those memories consequently leads to the loss of one’s soul. Similarly, when the Narrator discovers the disappeared ferry ticket “hidden in one of her mothers sculptures, to protect it from the memory police,” she is able to conjure up a memory of her mother which causes “her heart to beat hard.” Ogawa’s deliberate description of the Narrator’s heart beating hard further exemplifies the significance of memory in shaping individual identity. Therefore, Ogawa’s novel displays how one’s identity is constructed through remembrance.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: “In Born a Crime, outsiders lack the…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 70%: Trevor Noah's memoir, Born a Crime, primarily examines the systemically oppressed society within the period of pre…
Trevor Noah's memoir, Born a Crime, primarily examines the systemically oppressed society within the period of pre and post-Apartheid. He initially exculpates the ability of certain individuals that lack the capability of conforming to societal norms to develop a definitive identity. Noah explores theories of Apartheid and gender as limiting factors that alter identity while championing the proficiency of language to define an individual.
Initially, Noah criticises the racially segregated nature of Apartheid as a component which results in the incapability of individuals to define their identity. He depicts Trevor as an individual who was unable to belong, framing him as the "floater friend", demonstrating Trevor's lack of ability to conform to specific societal groups, solely due to being of mixed race. Noah also depicts the setting of Soweto as influential due to its lack of multiracialism, claiming "99% of Soweto was black, and then there was [Trevor]". This highlights the systemic ability of Apartheid to separate particular individuals due to race, and that location can ultimately influence identity. Furthermore, Noah excoriates the requirement for individuals to purposely alter their identities, portraying Trevor as "this character, [who] played the stereotype". He demonstrates that multiple individuals are forced to comply with the societal conformities of Apartheid, altering their identities.
VCE · Text Response
Text Response: “I can’t help it when people are…
VCE Text Response essay scoring 87.5%: 1950s and 60s America was engulfed by fear and hostility; the national identity built on the requirement of…
1950s and 60s America was engulfed by fear and hostility; the national identity built on the requirement of social norms and gender roles to be strictly adhered to. Writing amidst the physical and psychological violence of this time period, Shirley Jackson weaponises her novella, We Have Always Lived in the Castle, to criticise the sinister side of humanity that lies just below the surface of domesticity. Her horror delves into the capabilities of all individuals to be cruel when their hatred is not matched by empathy, thus exposing the consequences of blind adherence to damaging social strictures. While Jackson exposes violence as inherent within human nature, and therefore inexorable, her text examines the consequences of punishment on the human mind. She urges that both violence and punishment are ultimately products of a society that lacks compassion.
VCE · Creative Response
Creative Response: Title: At What Cost
VCE Creative Response essay scoring 90%: At What Cost? By midnight, the city had folded itself into silence. Rain tapped against my window and my phone…
At What Cost?
By midnight, the city had folded itself into silence. Rain tapped against my window and my phone lit the desk again.
I’ll be there tomorrow.
Anika, my closest friend, had sent it hours earlier.
Tomorrow, she would stand outside the college gates again. For four months, the administration had barred female students from classes while lessons continued without us. We gathered on one side of the iron bars while students crossed between classrooms on the other, close enough to hear the bell yet forbidden from answering it.
Tomorrow’s protest would be our first public refusal to keep waiting quietly. We wanted one thing: open the gates and let us return to our classrooms.
My mother appeared in the doorway.
“You’re not going.”
“I didn’t say I was.”
Her eyes moved to Nisha’s photograph, six stitches above her eyebrow after the last demonstration, then she left without closing the door.
I turned tomorrow over in my mind, searching for a side that did not cut. Nisha’s stitches told me to stay; four months of locked gates pulled the other way. Fear argued carefully, and none of its evidence was false. Yet staying home meant another classroom beginning without us.
Until then, I had thought the cost of protest was easy to calculate: bruises, arrests, a mother waiting by the door. I had never tried calculating the price of silence.
I imagined Krishna beside me — the Hindu god I had grown up hearing about whenever duty and consequence became difficult to separate. He sat cross-legged in my chair, perfectly calm while I paced.
That night, I did not want wisdom. I wanted an instruction.
“We tried doing this properly,” I said. “Letters, a petition with hundreds of names, then meetings where they thanked us for our patience and promised our concerns were being considered.”
“Considered, reviewed, scheduled. They have a remarkable number of words for not yet.”
By the third meeting, Nisha was sketching flowers while another administrator explained why nothing could change.
“They heard us,” I had said afterwards.
“They received us,” Anika corrected.
“So what do we do tomorrow?” I asked Krishna. “Another letter? Another meeting? Every quieter way of asking to come back inside has led nowhere.”
He watched me for a moment.
“And what will staying home cost?”
I looked towards Nisha’s photograph.
“They let us speak,” I said, “but a voice is not the same thing as power.”
The next morning, thirty-seven of us stood outside the gates.
Nisha wore her usual white shoes. Anika stumbled over her first line, swore under her breath and made us laugh. Krishna lounged on the low wall as though waiting for the bell.