VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: You're in their backyard By Millie…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 70%: Section C — Student's latest handwritten response Analysis of You're in their backyard The widespread issue…
Section C — Student's latest handwritten response
Analysis of You're in their backyard
The widespread issue surrounding traveller's behaviours and their effects on the Australian ecosystem has become increasingly relevant. In her article “You're in their backyard”, published on the travel-centred website Hit the Road, writer Millie Anderson condemns reckless traveller behaviours, and champions for a more considerate, prepared and kinder travelling mindset. Initially Anderson appeals to Australian travel enthusiasts through an anecdotal and appreciative tone, before transitioning to a more critical and condemnatory tone to showcase their effects on wildlife and humans alike, ultimately using a sardonic tone and urging argument to demand action. Aiming to inform travellers in Australia about the impact of their behaviour and to incite meaningful change.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Argument Analysis
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 85%: In response to the overall concern over the past few years, residents are aware of the environmental impact and…
In response to the overall concern over the past few years, residents are aware of the environmental impact and general safety of certain individuals in relation to the use of fireworks at the celebrations of New Years. In 2025, Jack Adut published “Lighting the Way: A New Year, a New Celebration”, contending for the removal of fireworks in celebrations and replacing through implementing digital, projected lightshows. Adut focuses this piece towards individuals who experience high sensitivity to loud sounds and toward environmentalists who cherish nature, for the purpose of persuading against the general use of fireworks and making the effects on both people and the environment more publicly acknowledged. Adut uses a non-formal, more friendly tone as a way to connect with the audience on a more personal and emotional level to further persuade them.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: 11 2020 ENGLISH EXAM SECTION C –…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: Following the recent speech, stakeholders have been forced to challenge the implications of the 'Recreational…
Following the recent speech, stakeholders have been forced to challenge the implications of the 'Recreational use of drones.' Young farmer Warwick Bandle advocates for banning drones from 'inexperienced users' to reduce the damages of 'harvest time' and reducing the time and costly problem they provide. Bandle negatively and formally contends that drones being used for recreational use is damaging farmers crops and therefore needs to be banned.
Initially, the author orientates by negatively framing drone usage by 'inexperienced users' in the photograph provided in his speech. In the foreground a drone is represented to be growing from the surface which contrasts the crops sprouting around it. This low angle shot provides a middle aged women in the background in shallow depth of field where she seems to be carrying a flower. This aspect of nature creates the illusion that humans value the environment however picking this part of nature from the roots it originated from highlights how humans are ultimately stopping the growth of the environment. Continuing this message, the drone in sharp focus positions drone lovers to understand the cheap and plastic material of these discarded drones are resulting in everlasting impacts on farmers lifestyle. Bandle's appeal to fear is exemplified from emotive language with the drones being 'left to rust away in the field until harvest time' illustrating the careless nature of people who fly drones for recreational use. Additionally the series of rhetorical questions, builds the pacing of the authors opening strategy by revealing the detrimental harms that drones impose on nature. Acknowledging tourists are important for 'supporting businesses,' the author criticises that flying drones originates from the increase of people exploring Byways in regional Victorica drawing back to the importance of banning drones for recreational use.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: 2025 vcaa section c
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 90%: The annual Timberoona tradition of fireworks display for the new year has received concerns from residents…
The annual Timberoona tradition of fireworks display for the new year has received concerns from residents surrounding its impact. Local resident Jack Adut voices such concerns in his article “Lighting the way: a new year, and a new celebration”, earnestly addressing fellow residents to gain support for his proposed alternative of a lightshow. He enthusiastically shares his appreciation for the annual new year tradition, yet concernedly delineates its harmful effect on the environment, arguing an alternative must be implemented. Consequently, Adut reveals the firework shows to be inaccessible for many and disruptive towards animals, optimistically presenting the lightshow as a preferred solution in contrast. Ultimately, he coaxes fellow community members to realise the change to a lightshow is actually overall beneficial for their community.
From the outset, Adut ardently lauds the annual new years celebrations, appealing to his community’s shared love for the traditions. However, despite affirming their mutual support of a big celebration, he leads residents to realise the destructive impact these fireworks are having. Adut utilises positively charged descriptions of the “beautiful setting” of Timberoona Park, emphasising his love for community to build rapport with fellow community members. This notion is intensified through his vivid imagery of the “spectacular pyrotechnics”, making clear to readers his appreciation of the fireworks. In doing so, Adut establishes his position as a member of the community who similarly enjoys the new years celebration, therefore positioning his later critique to be out of genuine founded concern rather than personal distaste for fireworks or celebration. Shifting to a more serious tone to underscore the nature of the issue, Adut is sympathetic towards those that remain unaware of the fireworks’ negative impacts, commenting he had only realised once he had seen it “firsthand”. Thus, he avoids alienating firework lovers for their lack of knowledge, allowing his explanation of its consequences to be better received. Elaborating on the fireworks’ detriments, Adut employs concerning imagery of “waste and debris that is blown into the air and lands in waterways and nature reserves”, exposing its impacts as a “threat” to their environment. Through such depictions and dangerous connotations of the fireworks’ impacts as a “threat”, Adut provokes his audience to realise the severity of the environmental destruction fireworks cause. In striking juxtaposition to this, he presents the alternative of light shows which as “non‑toxic, silent and, most importantly, a cleaner option”, appearing much more appealing in contrast to the current fireworks.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Thank you for attending this emergency…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: VCE English Section C — 2024 Argument Analysis As “Our Local Gym” faces an uncertain financial future, its…
VCE English Section C — 2024 Argument Analysis
As “Our Local Gym” faces an uncertain financial future, its members must decide whether to accept an unconventional partnership with confectionery company Long Live Lollies to preserve their community. In a speech delivered at an emergency meeting, Sandy Gestalt, chair of the gym’s committee, seeks to persuade members to support the proposal despite its apparent conflict with the gym’s commitment to health and fitness. Gestalt acknowledges these concerns while arguing that financial security is essential to maintaining the gym’s inclusive culture. By initially emphasising the community’s value, highlighting the consequences of closure and reframing the partnership as an opportunity for collective growth, she encourages members to prioritise the gym’s survival over their reservations. The accompanying visuals reinforce this argument by associating confectionery with happiness, connection and physical vitality, ultimately presenting the partnership as a pragmatic compromise.
Gestalt initially establishes the significance of Our Local Gym by reminding members of the community they have collectively created. Her assertion that “we are a community” foregrounds the gym’s social value, positioning members as participants in a shared identity rather than simply customers of a fitness facility. Similarly, the acknowledgement that members “have built your fitness” recognises their personal investment, encouraging them to consider what they stand to lose if the gym closes. By emphasising the gym as a “safe space for all people”, Gestalt also reinforces its inclusive ethos, distinguishing it from fitness environments that may prioritise appearance over belonging. This appeal encourages members to feel pride in the gym’s values and responsibility for preserving them. The accompanying visual of cheerful cartoon confectionery characters reinforces this sense of community through their smiling expressions, bright presentation and gestures suggestive of friendliness. Rather than depicting the lollies as an unwelcome commercial intrusion, the image gives them an approachable and positive identity. The visual therefore begins to soften the apparent divide between the gym’s health-conscious culture and the confectionery company’s interests. By establishing that the gym’s greatest value lies in the community it sustains, Gestalt prepares members to consider the partnership as a possible means of protecting that shared identity.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Background information The Calm…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: In her ‘Behind the Cape’ vlog for followers of her social media account, Kinsley Wyler seeks to persuade…
In her ‘Behind the Cape’ vlog for followers of her social media account, Kinsley Wyler seeks to persuade “fans of [her] vlog” and “any newbies who have happened to scroll by” to support and contribute to advance the acceptance and accessibility of animal assisted services in honour of ‘Animal Therapy Awarenes Day’. Wylers primary aim through her sympathetic and uplifting tone is to encourage and support therapy animalsby moving away from the like button and financially contributing, to ensure the continued impact of these “superheroes”.
Wyler opens her vlog by juxtaposing her fictional role as a ‘superhero’ with the ‘real magic’ of therapy animals, immediately establishing a sense of authenticity for her audience. Wylers use of the metaphor “tiny superheroes” evokes a sense of recognition and humility towards therapy animals, through the metaphor Wyler creates an atmosphere among the audience of inspiration and awe to ensure the audience who is attached with superheroes also finds joy and envisions a sense of care for these animals. Furthermore, Wyler adopts a colloquial and self-deprecating tone, using wordplay such as ‘taking a paws’ to foster a sense of intimacy and lightheartedness. By referencing common pet names like ‘Cookie the cat,’ she appeals to the emotional attatchement viewers have with their pets and makes the audience feel as though they share a similar interest. This aims to position Wyler in a place free from any assumptions, by referencing multiple differnt animals rather than common to build an inclusive, engaged and common-interest-sharing audience.In reference to the "three image scroll on-screen", Wyler strongly asserts her personal "impact up close" with therapy animals. The image contains three different individuals (a little boy, older woman and a middle aged man) smiling and enjoying time with the fury friends. The smiles on their face illustrate the "genuine connection" the individuals who are in "rehab facilities", "nursing homes", and "primary schools". This demonstrates the varied diversity of individuals these therapy animals are impacting and "healing". Wyler promotes individuals through personal experiences and lifes changed seen to get involved and keep this organisation running to better the health of more individuals.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: for vcaa 2020 exam
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 85%: The local community of the shire of Byways has had recent complaints surrounding the recreational usage of…
The local community of the shire of Byways has had recent complaints surrounding the recreational usage of drones by tourists in the area. Young farmer Warwick Bandle passionately addresses this issue in his speech to community-invested residents at a public meeting. He fervently details the significant harm unregulated drone usage has for farmers, urging council members to prioritise farmers’ needs over tourists’. Bandle reassures his audience of his stance on technology, affirming his support of drone use in non-recreational scenarios. Ultimately, Bandle logically posits the need for stricter regulation surrounding commercial drone use.
From the outset, Bandle is immediately critical of the harm inexperienced drone users bring to farmers. Affronted by the disregard for their farmland, Bandle highlights the severity of the issue, emphasising the importance of supporting farmers in their community. He firmly describes the issue to be a “costly problem for us farmers”, utilising inclusive language to relate to his fellow farmers’ experiences with the issue. In doing so, Bandle speaks for a broader group of farmers, making obvious the extensive effect drone misuse has had. Furthermore, he labels it to be potentially “lethal”, employing the term’s severe deadly connotations to make his community aware of how significant the ramifications can be, therefore creating a sense of urgency to solve the problem. The imagery of drones being “left to rust away in the field until harvest time” is supported by inclusion of the image of a woman chasing after her drone stuck in the field. Juxtaposition of the drone’s modern and high-tech appearance with the empty natural grass surroundings serves to underline the drone’s existence as intrusive and out of place. This sentiment is augmented by the descriptions of it “rusting away”, which Bandle uses to highlight the unnaturalness of the drone amongst the field. Therefore, he conveys to his audience the significant impact drone misuse has on farmers. Consequently, Bandle urges the council to defend the farmers over tourists, stressing the value they bring to the community through the metaphor of them being the “backbone of this community”. With this, Bandle repositions a community-focused audience to realise the important role of farmers in their community, thus becoming personally invested in the issue.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: 2021 Section C VCAA
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: In a social media post published on the Toppdale community voice page on the 12th of September 2021, cinema…
In a social media post published on the Toppdale community voice page on the 12th of September 2021, cinema marketing manager Ava urges the residents of Toppdale and the surrounding district to support their struggling local cinema as it faces a threat of forced closure. Adopting a concerned yet passionate tone, Ava contends that the despite growing popularity of streaming services, the cinema is an essential part of the towns historical identity and social fabric, offering the community with an experience that cannot be replaced. The post is accompanied by two images, one represents the inside of the cinema with people inside and the other one the exterior of the cinema.
Initially, Ava appeals to the community’s sense of nostalgia and collective identity by emphasising the cinemas longstanding historical significance as she states it has been a “part of the town since the 1910s”. Ava establishes it as a familiar and enduring institution that has shaped Toppdale across generations. The inclusive language of “our” fosters a sense of collective ownership, positioning the cinema as something belonging to the entire community rather than merely a commercial business. By eliciting feelings of belonging and nostalgia the residents of Toppdale are inclined to support the idea that the cinema must be saved. Furthermore, her reference to the cinema surviving major historical and technological changes, “DVDS”, “Television”, “The Great Depression”, presents the cinema as having endured previous challenges, which reinforces the cinemas resilience and importance, therefore encouraging the Toppdale residents to believe that the cinema can overcome its current difficulties of streaming service popularity and feel a sense of responsibility to help ensure this can be achieved. The image of people laughing together in a cinema reinforces Ava’s contention that the local cinema provides a vulnerable shared experience that cannot be replicated by watching films at home. The people’s laughter conveys a sense of enjoyment and excitement, encouraging Toppdale residents to associate the cinema with positive and memorable experiences that are worth preserving. Therefore, guiding them to want to return to the cinema to support it.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Taylor T. writes a blog about their…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: Mobile phones have taken control of our lives ever since they were introduced, they have become so addictive…
Mobile phones have taken control of our lives ever since they were introduced, they have become so addictive that we have them joint at our hips. There are always with us that society has felt the need to use these devices to show our locations to anyone and everyone without a second thought as to what the repercussions may be. in Taylor T posted a blog post online titled “Why i won’t be sharing my location with you anymore”, he argues that using mobile phones to share your location is dangerous and cause more harm than good. He uses a measured tone to persuade his audience of his followers of the blog and specifically his friends and family to stop sharing their locations with everyone.
Taylor suggests that the novelty of blasting their location to everyone they know has gone down the drain. he begins with emotive language by expressing that when he finally deleted all location sharing apps “[he] never felt saner”, this reference to feeling “saner” conveys a strong sense of personal relief and wellbeing and positions the audience to gather how freeing it felt for him to “be in control” of his safety and privacy. the nostalgic tone demonstrated through the personal anecdote of his initial feelings towards downloading location sharing apps when he first got his phone in high school, claiming it “was the coolest thing ever.” the past tense word of “was'“ implies how Taylor no longer believes that having other peoples whereabout is trendy. The repetition of “i could see” illuminates the abundant control a person can have when having access to someone’s location. This directly relates to the edited photograph of a person holding their phone with a map of a bunch of red dots flooding the screen. The red pings represent the locations of people we know in our lives and suddenly have their exact whereabouts without their consent, from getting the exact location of his friends from different classes to being able to see how far away his dad was to picking him up. This is intended to demonstrate to the readers how the accessing one’s location made us lose the opportunities we once had to actually call or message our loved ones to see how far they were because we already know the answer. Taylor uses juxtaposition to demonstrate both the pros and cons of sharing ones location, how it keeps a “peace of mind” by knowing that your loved ones are safe and that its easier than calling to check in on them. however its goes against ethics as it is an invasion of “privacy” and if hacked can lead to “stalkers.” The writer employs a list of relatable social dilemmas, including ‘how to stop sharing with someone without hurting their feelings’, to highlight the interpersonal complexities of location sharing, encouraging readers to reconsider the impact of digital tracking on their relationships.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: VCE 2024 EXAM
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 90%: Recently, Our Local Gym has lost essential council funding to keep the doors open which has caused them to seek…
Recently, Our Local Gym has lost essential council funding to keep the doors open which has caused them to seek alternative options. Commenting on the situation is committee chair Sandy Gestalt whose speech was presented to members of Our Local Gym. Gestalt argues that working with Long Live Lollies is the only way to save the gym and enthusiastically addresses members of Our Local Gym in an attempt to persuade the audience to vote in favour of the partnership with Long Live Lollies.
From the onset of the piece, Gestalt establishes Our Local Gym’s shared history and values with the gym members. She deliberately begins by acknowledging their collective “47 years” in operation has been supported by “council support” and “members”. By starting with mentioning their shared history, Gestalt attempts to build immediate rapport with the audience before jumping into her proposal. This invites the audience to have faith in Gestalt from the beginning which may translate to trusting her and her proposal to work with Long Live Lollies further on. Additionally, Gestalt continues by contrasting the values of Our Local Gym with the values of other commercial gyms. The speaker states that Our Local Gym is accepting of “all bodies and all fitness journeys” highlighting that they are inclusive and supportive which juxtaposes the “competitive” and “obnoxious” nature of commercial gyms. Through this, Gestalt attempts to reflect the sense of community and supportive values of Our Local Gym compared to alternative gyms that members may have to turn to if the funding issue can not be resolved. This may set up the members of the gym to support Gestalt's proposal as their values align with those of Our Local Gym. Throughout her introduction, Gestalt uses inclusive language through the collective use of “we”. She utilises this language to imply unity between herself and members of the gym in an attempt to make them feel a part of the community. This invites the audience to feel personally accountable for the gym’s survival, which compels them to support Gestalt’s proposal to save the gym. Cumulatively, Gestalt attempts to connect with the members of the local gym to make them feel involved in the Our Local Gym community.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Prompt-Screen time amongst adults
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 82.5%: The arising issue of screen time amongst parents has left an everlasting impact on future generations. With…
The arising issue of screen time amongst parents has left an everlasting impact on future generations. With parents often working long hours behind a screen and then coming home and being behind a screen again, it portrays an image within their children that being on technology for hours on end is a normal thing. Technology has become a normality within society as it’s seen to be vital for everyday life, however the general community has seen an alarming rise of how much parents are using screen time and how it not only affects them but it also affects others around, additionally creating a cultural norm that using your phone for long hours is normal. This issue has become so impactful that authors centralized around a university speak up about this, these people include Michael Wheeler, David Dunstan, Lauren Arundell, Mats Hallgren and Paddy Dempsey, all these people have collectively shared their thoughts about this issue and their standpoint as people involved with the younger generation.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Opinion Comment: How Victoria’s bike…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 82.5%: As cities continue to grow, the use of public spaces is under constant negotiation and change. In particular,…
As cities continue to grow, the use of public spaces is under constant negotiation and change. In particular, the friction between driving and cycling as forms of commuting. With the expansion of Victoria’s safe bike and roll network, the benefit of these lanes and in contrast the inconvenience of them to drivers, have sparked passionate debates online. Retired software engineer and Victorian citizen Jim Mayer took to ‘Times Colonist’ in December 2025, publishing an opinion article titled ‘How Victoria’s bike and roll network changed my life’. Within his article, Mayer contends that Victorias bike infrastructure is overwhelmingly beneficial to the community, providing safe, efficient routes to cyclists. Adopting a personal and appreciative tone, Mayer appeals to his audience of Victorian commuters, particularly drivers who dislike the prevalent bike lanes, to illuminate the positive impact they have on a large population of Victorians.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Parminder Preciosa is a columnist for…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 72.5%: In her opinion piece, “Taxing the T-bone: it’s time to give red meat the chop,” Parminder Preciosa argues…
In her opinion piece, “Taxing the T-bone: it’s time to give red meat the chop,” Parminder Preciosa argues that red meat consumption should be taxed because of its harmful effects on people’s health, the environment and animals. Preciosa uses a dramatic and alarming tone to encourage readers to reconsider their thiughts towards red meat. She begins by comparing red meat to smoking, before creating her argument through health statistics and environmental and ethical concerns. She ultimately presents tax as a reasonable way to reduce consumption and make individuals responsible for the costs their choices make on society.
Preciosa first argues that like smoking cigarette, eating red meat is harmful to our health and should be taxed to discourage consumption of it. She begins by placing the reader in a restaurant scenario, describing a meal of “sausages and mashed potatoes” before introducing the smell of “cigarette smoke”. Her detailed description of the smoke “stinging” the readers eyes and making their food taste like “an astray” creates a strong sense of disgust. By placing the reader directly in this uncomfortable situation, Preciosa encourages them to sympathize with her anger towards smokers. She then transfers the negative feelings toward red meant, claiming suages are “just as much a threat to your health as that packet of cigarettes.” Through this analogy, she makes readers recognise red meat as another dangerous habit and that society should be concerned about it. Her comparison is made to shock readers who usually view red meat as an ordinary thing.
Preciosa then strengthens her health argument through statistics and scientific evidence, presenting red meat as a threat to society. She mentions the World Health Organization classifying red meat as a “carcinogen” and states that millions of deaths are associated with red and processed meat consumption. She also highlights the healthcare cost of US$285 billion. By presenting these statistics, Preciosa appeals to logic and reason, making her argument appear supported by authentic evidence rather than being her personal opinion. However, she also acknowledges that readers may react with “disbelief” because foods such as bacon and pepperoni are enjoyable. Preciosa reinforces her comparison with cigarettes, suggesting that society has underestimated the dangers of harmful products. Her dramatic language combines with the statistics to encourage readers to take the health risks seriously.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Garcia Marquez conveys the…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 70%: Introduction - Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “Chronicle of a Death Foretold” is a novella that revolves around the…
Introduction -
Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s “Chronicle of a Death Foretold” is a novella that revolves around the brutal murder of Santiago Nasar and raises questions around collective responsibility and moral weight. The author suggests that subconscious obedience to societal expectations is the catalyst to injustices. Marquez emphasises the way double standards in society are used to justify suffering, while also celebrating the defiance of unwritten social rules.
BP1 -
Through his novella, Marquez challenges the notion that thoughtless compliance with social norms is beneficial. By presenting Santiago Nasar’s death as a consequence of adherence to expectations, the author exposes how social expectations can contribute to the immoral actions of individuals. For instance, in court, Pedro and Pablo Vicario’s justification of their crime is simply “it was a matter of honour”, suggesting that they viewed the honour-killing as necessary and a normal part of their society. Marquez utilises their justification to scrutinise the way societal standards around restoring honour cause people to interpret murder as justified rather than a crime. Marquez presents such social norms as eroding individual empathy, as the Vicario brothers, despite taking responsibility for the murder, asserted “but we’re innocent” in court. Through the perspective of the Vicario brothers, the author suggests that unjust social standards can weaken moral judgement by disguising an act of immorality as duty. Moreover, Marquez emphasises the way unethical social expectations lay the foundation for injustice. For example, Pablo Vicario’s fiancee Prudencia Cotes later admitted that she wouldn’t have married him if “he hadn’t done what a man should do.” By presenting the Vicario brothers’ crime as a gender expectation, the author highlights how blindly adhering to such standards within society can shape actions and contribute to negative consequences such as the tragic death of Santiago Nasar. Marquez conveys that when social expectations are viewed as obligations rather than individual choice, blind adherence and tragedies become inevitable.
BP2 -
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Good morning fellow book-lovers. I…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 82.5%: Amidst the rise of e-readers and other electronic literature devices, discussion has grown about the risks…
Amidst the rise of e-readers and other electronic literature devices, discussion has grown about the risks they pose to future literacy. Addressing an audience of teachers, librarians, and senior school students from the local area, Mrs Elliot’s speech at the opening of the ‘Reading: the future’ forum outlines the potential harm perpetuated by the complete transition away from traditional literature. Accompanying her speech with two visual sources she balances the benefit and detriment provided by e-readers both intellectually and culturally.
Elliot commences her speech by establishing a sense of understanding with the audience, and constructing her persona as a pragmatic figure, outlining how e-readers have failed to deliver their promised benefits. Beginning with an address to her ‘fellow book lovers’, the speaker immediately constructs rapport with more literarily inclined listeners. She cultivates an intimate in-group with them in order to ensure they feel represented by her perspective. This predisposes the audience to hold greater respect for Elliot’s opinion and feel more invested in preserving traditional literature, as it represents an important part of their shared community. Building off this specific connection, the orator then describes herself as an ‘early adopter’, the proaction implied in the term ‘adopter’ suggesting her tendency to willingly accept technology. She thereby shifts her focus onto more technologically inclined and younger audience members, allowing her to avoid appearing resistant to change, thereby framing later arguments as arising from genuine concern, rather than ideological opposition. By acknowledging that she initially misjudged the impacts of e-readers, thinking that they ‘had to be a good thing’, the speaker affirms a pragmatic and authentic persona, as she is willing to recognise her errors. Meanwhile the certainty of the word ‘had’ is designed to remind the audience that even apparent facts can be flawed, encouraging them to revisit their certainty about the benefits provided by e-readers. To emphasise this notion Elliot continues by contrasting a previous idealistic view of ‘effortless’ change with a current, more grounded reality to reflect her shifting opinions, from naivety to realism. Elliot thereby encourages the audience to similarly challenge their preexisting assumptions of the benefits provided by technological change, advising a more critical and reasoned approach. Thus, Elliot’s introduction is designed to position book-lovers and younger, tech-comfortable audiences to feel closely connected to and represented by her, while nonetheless subtly positioning them to support the continual necessity for physical books, despite the transition towards digital alternatives.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Good morning fellow book-lovers. I…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 90%: Amidst the rise of e-readers and other electronic literature devices discussion has grown about the risks they…
Amidst the rise of e-readers and other electronic literature devices discussion has grown about the risks they pose to future literacy. Addressing an audience of teachers, librarians, and senior school students from the local area, Mrs Elliot’s speech at the opening of the ‘Reading: the future’ forum outlines the potential harm perpetuated by the complete transition away from traditional literature. Accompanying her speech with two visual sources she balances the benefit and detriment provided by e-readers both intellectually and culturally.
Elliot commences her speech by establishing a sense of understanding with the audience, and constructing her persona as a pragmatic figure, outlining how e-readers have failed to deliver their promised benefits. Beginning with an address to her ‘fellow book lovers’, the speaker immediately constructs rapport with more literarily inclined listeners. She cultivates an intimate in-group with them in order to ensure they feel represented by her perspective. This predisposes the audience to hold greater respect for Elliot’s opinion and feel more invested in preserving traditional literature, as it represents an important part of their shared community. Building off this specific connection, the orator then describes herself as an ‘early adopter’, the agency of the term ‘adopter’ suggesting her tendency to willingly accept technology. She thereby shifts her focus onto more technologically inclined and younger audience members, allowing her to avoid appearing resistant to change, thereby framing later arguments as arising from genuine concern, rather than ideological opposition. By acknowledging that she initially misjudged the impacts of e-readers, thinking that they ‘had to be a good thing’, the speaker affirms a pragmatic and authentic persona, as she is willing to recognise her errors. Meanwhile the certainty of the word ‘had’ is designed to remind the audience that even apparent facts can be flawed, encouraging them to revisit their certainty about the benefits provided by e-readers. To emphasise this notion Elliot continues by contrasting a previous idealistic view of ‘effortless’ change with a current, more grounded reality to reflect her shifting opinions, from naivety to realism. Elliot thereby encourages the audience to similarly challenge their preexisting assumptions of the benefits provided by technological change, advising a more critical and reasoned approach. Additionally, asserting that she is ‘an enthusiastic reader’ like many in her audience, Elliot fosters further personal connection with them through shared experiences. This is strengthened by the inclusive and active language of ‘we actively create’ which allows the audience to feel like involved participants, validating their desire to enact meaningful change. The speaker asserts literature as a mechanism through which individuals develop meaning, rather than merely passively consuming. This affirms the audience's sense of responsibility for protecting books and heightens their desire to preserve physical media, rather than moving entirely to e-readers. Thus, Elliot’s introduction is designed to position book-lovers and younger, tech-comfortable audiences to feel closely connected to and represented by her, while nonetheless subtly positioning them to support the continual necessity for physical books, despite the transition towards digital alternatives.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Page 14 of 14 Section C English Lab…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 67.5%: Section C - J store Regarding the recent concerning trends at J store including profit drops and a decrease…
Section C - J store
Regarding the recent concerning trends at J store including profit drops and a decrease in employee satisfaction, CEO, Janine Jennings, released a short video for all employees to view. Adressed towards all staff, the piece adopts a concerned yet optimistic tone to contend that it is nessessary for their solution to be put into place, to turn around the business for the better. Jennings reassures staff that they will work through this slump as a team, as long as everyone embraces the plan.
Jennings opens her piece by establishing gratitude and the key family values of the business to build a positive rapport with her audience. Through refering to all staff as "members of our J-store family," and "thanking" them for their time, she expresses gratitude towards everyone that contributes towards their business, whilst painting the picture for the audience that instead of a regular business, they are a family that look after and care for each other. This is reinforced through the personal anecdote of the author and her sister founding J-store with the goal of all employees feeling like "they were being cared for." This personalises the business, positioning the audience to view both the author and the business itself as a family of genuine people that care about those around them.
Having established the core values of the business, Jennings shifts to a more concerned tone, acknowledging the issue at hand, reassuring that action will be taken. This concerning shift confronts viewers with the "concerning trends," positioning them to be more inclined to the later proposal for a solution. Jennings' claim that "most concerningly, employee satisfaction is also down," positions the audience to view J-store as a business that truly values their staff, with employee satisfaction as a top priority, following
the confrontation, Jennings switches to a reassuring voice, encouraging that a change can be made. Through the inclusive language of "we," Jennings implies a sense of shared goals by everyone to improve wellbeing, painting the business as a team that must work together and support each other. Thus Jennings positions her viewers to feel prepared to act out the following solution to make a change for not only them, but the business as a whole.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: argument analysis on "Preserving the…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school…
In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school student Taylor Swann has written an opinion piece titled "Preserving the Essence: The Perils of Inappropriate Suburban Housing Development", published on website Act Now as of the 27/09/2024. Swann contends that the manner in which suburban housing developments are occurring is unsustainable for the future of Australia, with particular focus on extending this message urgently to an audience primarily of Australian high school students, but also expanding reach to architects, policy makers, and urban planners. Swann uses a stark black and white visual in this piece to aid in emphasis of the contention through creation of deep contrasts between concepts and ideas.
Swann opens by matter of factly addressing her audience of “Australian senior high school students”, this direct address aids in creating a sense of obligation to continue reading Swann's piece for Australian Highschool students due to being directly informed as stakeholders of this issue. Swann opens with the argument of direct concern towards the impacts that unsustainable urban infrastructure can have on students’ senior education, suggesting that the harms this has on students' own development can be a hindrance to successful learning. Swann proceeds to pull focus to a key aspect of high school students' lives (being education) by stating that “overcrowded schools, bad public transportation, and congested roads” are key negative determinants of unsustainable housing development. By directly referencing harmful impacts to education, Swann is attempting to create a sense of unity through the universal experience of school students having education whilst also trying to increase urgency and concern for the harmful effects of suburban housing developments on a student's personal life. After these initial statements Swann proceeds to alter perspective to a connecting argument in which she contends that the environmental ramifications of unsustainable development is accelerating the young generation of Australia towards a future of decreased biodiversity and environmental health, further appealing to a sense of moral obligation to care for the environment as a young audience who are commonly concerned with the concept of climate change. Swann states that numerous species have been “displaced” and that there has been “disruption of delicate ecosystems”, by characterising ecosystems as“delicate” Swann is exemplifying the power in which humans possess over flora and fauna, and appeals to the guilt of architects and policy makers who are supporting these housing developments. The suggestion of these “delicate ecosystems” also presents the biodiversity of Australia as a fragile environment requiring protection, which furthermore appeals to the empathy of high school students towards the defenseless nature of the environment in the face of human control. Swann uses this to furthermore encourage a moral responsibility from the audience to act in a sustainable manner to help conserve and protect the ecosystems of Australia. Swann also proceeds to refer to environmental areas as “green spaces” which are being destroyed. A black and white visual is utilised by Swann with an aim to present a contrast between the current development of urban housing as a dark, and industrialized industry, compared to the connotations of the phrase “green space”, suggesting colour and external environments to reside in, which are not evident in the darkened image filled with houses and a lack of environmental areas. This contrast is used by Swann to appeal to the concern of high school students about how their future may become if change does not occur, encouraging action and further engagement with the opinion piece, promoting a sense of grief and disappointment for the loss of a potential future.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: argument analysis on "Preserving the…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school…
In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school student Taylor Swann has written an opinion piece titled "Preserving the Essence: The Perils of Inappropriate Suburban Housing Development", published on website Act Now as of the 27/09/2024. Swann contends that the manner in which suburban housing developments are occurring is unsustainable for the future of Australia, with particular focus on extending this message urgently to an audience primarily of Australian high school students, but also expanding reach to architects, policy makers, and urban planners. Swann uses a stark black and white visual in this piece to aid in emphasis of the contention through creation of deep contrasts between concepts and ideas.
Swann opens by matter of factly addressing her audience of “Australian senior high school students”, this direct address aids in creating a sense of obligation to continue reading Swann's piece for Australian Highschool students due to being directly informed as stakeholders of this issue. Swann opens with the argument of direct concern towards the impacts that unsustainable urban infrastructure can have on students’ senior education, suggesting that the harms this has on students' own development can be a hindrance to successful education. Swann proceeds to pull focus to a key aspect of high school students' lives (being education) by stating that “overcrowded schools, bad public transportation, and congested roads” are key negative determinants of unsustainable housing development. By directly referencing harmful impacts to education, Swann is attempting to create a sense of unity through the universal experience of school students having education whilst also trying to increase urgency and concern for the harmful effects of suburban housing developments on a student's personal life. After these initial statements Swann proceeds to alter perspective to a connecting argument in which she contends that the environmental ramifications of unsustainable development is accelerating the young generation of Australia towards a future of decreased biodiversity and environmental health, further appealing to a sense of moral obligation to care for the environment as a young audience who are commonly concerned with the concept of climate change. Swann states that numerous species have been “displaced” and that there has been “disruption of delicate ecosystems”, by characterising ecosystems as“delicate” Swann is exemplifying the power in which humans possess over flora and fauna, and appeals to the guilt of architects and policy makers who are supporting these housing developments. The suggestion of these “delicate ecosystems” also presents the biodiversity of Australia as a fragile environment requiring protection, which furthermore appeals to the empathy of high school students towards the defenseless nature of the environment in the face of human control. Swann uses this to furthermore encourage a moral responsibility from the audience to act in a sustainable manner to help conserve and protect the ecosystems of Australia. Swann also proceeds to refer to environmental areas as “green spaces” which are being destroyed. The use of a black and white visual is utilised by Swann with an aim to present a contrast between the current development of urban housing as a dark, and industrialized industry, compared to the connotations of the phrase “green space”, suggesting colour and external environments to reside in, which are not evident in the darkened image filled with houses and a lack of environmental areas. This contrast is used by Swann to appeal to the concern of high school students about how their future may become if change does not occur, encouraging action and further engagement with the opinion piece, promoting a sense of grief and disappointment for the loss of a potential future.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: argument analysis on "Preserving the…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school…
In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school student Taylor Swann has written an opinion piece titled "Preserving the Essence: The Perils of Inappropriate Suburban Housing Development", published on website Act Now as of the 27/09/2024. Swann contends that the manner in which suburban housing developments are occurring is unsustainable for the future of Australia, with particular focus on extending this message urgently to an audience primarily of Australian high school students, but also expanding reach to architects, policy makers, and urban planners. The accompaniment of a black and white visual is also present in this piece to aid in emphasis of Swann’s contention through creation of stark contrasts.
Swann opens by matter of factly addressing her audience of “Australian senior high school students”, this direct address aids in creating a sense of obligation to continue reading Swann's piece for Australian Highschool students due to being directly informed as stakeholders of this issue. Swann opens with the argument of direct concern towards the impacts that unsustainable urban infrastructure can have on students’ senior education, suggesting that the harms this has on students' own development can be a hindrance to successful education. Swann proceeds to pull focus to a key aspect of high school students' lives (being education) by stating that “overcrowded schools, bad public transportation, and congested roads” are key negative determinants of unsustainable housing development. By directly referencing harmful impacts to education, Swann is attempting to create a sense of unity through the universal experience of school students having education whilst also trying to increase urgency and concern for the harmful effects of suburban housing developments on a student's personal life. After these initial statements Swann proceeds to alter perspective to a connecting argument in which she contends that the environmental ramifications of unsustainable development is accelerating the young generation of Australia towards a future of decreased biodiversity and environmental health, further appealing to a sense of moral obligation to care for the environment as a young audience who are commonly concerned with the concept of climate change. Swann states that numerous species have been “displaced” and that there has been “disruption of delicate ecosystems”, by characterising ecosystems as“delicate” Swann is exemplifying the power in which humans possess over flora and fauna, and appeals to the guilt of architects and policy makers who are supporting these housing developments. The suggestion of these “delicate ecosystems” also presents the biodiversity of Australia as a fragile environment requiring protection, which furthermore appeals to the empathy of high school students towards the defenseless nature of the environment in the face of human control. Swann uses this to furthermore encourage a moral responsibility from the audience to act in a sustainable manner to help conserve and protect the ecosystems of Australia. Swann also proceeds to refer to environmental areas as “green spaces” in which are being destroyed. The use of a black and white visual is utilised by Swann with an aim to present a contrast between the current development of urban housing as a dark, and industrialized industry, compared to the connotations of the phrase “green space”, suggesting colour and external environments to reside in, which are not evident in the darkened image filled with houses and a lack of environmental areas. This contrast is used by Swann to appeal to the concern of high school students about how their future may become if change does not occur, encouraging action and further engagement with the opinion piece, promoting a sense of grief and disappointment for the loss of a potential future.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: argument analysis on "Preserving the…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 72.5%: In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school…
In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school student Taylor Swann has written an opinion piece titled "Preserving the Essence: The Perils of Inappropriate Suburban Housing Development", published on website Act Now as of the 27/09/2024. Swann contends that the manner in which suburban housing developments are occurring is unsustainable for the future of Australia, with particular focus on extending this message urgently to an audience primarily of Australian high school students, but also expanding reach to architects, policy makers, and urban planners. The accompaniment of a black and white visual is also present in this piece to aid in emphasis of Swann’s contention through creation of stark contrasts.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: argument analysis on "Preserving the…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 70%: In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school…
In light of the recent events regarding the sustainability of suburban housing developments, high school student Taylor Swann has written an opinion piece titled "Preserving the Essence: The Perils of Inappropriate Suburban Housing Development", published on website Act Now as of (insert date that I couldn't find). Swann contends that the manner in which suburban housing developments are occurring is unsustainable for the future of Australia, with particular focus on extending this message urgently to an audience primarily of Australian high school students, but also expanding reach to architects, policy makers, and urban planners. The accompaniment of a black and white visual is also present in this piece to aid in emphasis of Swann’s contention.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: VCE ENGLISH UNIT 2 Task 10: Exploring…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 97.5%: "Daylight Robbery" (Draft 5) FIVE DOLLARS... for a basic loaf of white bread. [Pause] ANOTHER five dollars...…
"Daylight Robbery" (Draft 5)
FIVE DOLLARS... for a basic loaf of white bread. [Pause] ANOTHER five dollars... for a standard two-litre carton of milk. SEVEN... whole dollars if you also want free-range eggs. It's just your regular weekly trolley. Lately... standing at the checkout makes me feel like I'm watching a slow-motion car crash. MOST of us have stopped looking at the digital screen... because we already KNOW the total is going to empty our wallets.
But don't let ANYONE convince you this is just normal inflation. Yes, inflation explains SOME price increases. But when the price of a basic loaf of bread has climbed more than TWENTY-TWO PERCENT, and eggs by over FORTY-ONE PERCENT, in just a few years... we have to ask whether MARKET POWER is playing a role. Because market power doesn't automatically mean price gouging. But it CAN create the conditions where anticompetitive conduct becomes harder to challenge. And that's the problem. There's ONE tool that would genuinely tip that balance back: the Federal Government should give the ACCC conditional, last-resort divestiture powers... allowing it to require major supermarkets to sell stores when an investigation PROVES sustained anticompetitive conduct and existing remedies have failed.
[Long pause]
Because behind all these percentages and corporate reports... are REAL people. The ACCC found that Coles and Woolworths account for roughly SIXTY-SEVEN PERCENT of Australia's supermarket retail sales, while Australians faced significant cost-of-living pressure. And groceries are just ONE part of the problem. Housing. Electricity. Transport. Food. Every essential expense takes another bite.
But behind those statistics is the HUMAN cost, and it's worth being specific about what that actually looks like. It's the single mother of three recalculating her trolley over an extra dollar. It's the pensioner who wants to get sweets for their grandchildren, then quietly puts them back. It's the uni student choosing between rent... [Pause] ...and dinner. When market power is concentrated, the people with the least room to move can have the most to lose. And THAT is why competition matters.
[Long pause - shift tone]
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: the issue for the argument analysis is…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 85%: Written by the editorial of the Washington Post — a major American newspaper with an audience of Californian…
Written by the editorial of the Washington Post — a major American newspaper with an audience of Californian citizens who value free speech and stand against laws prohibiting free expression, the editor writes in response to the March 2025 lawsuit against Meta and Google, filed by a woman named KGM. The lawsuit aimed to push large social media giants to admit their platforms were deliberately designed as addictive and to add an age ban to protect the youth from adverse mental health problems. While many progressives praised the jury’s decision to hold the giants accountable, the editorial writes to their conservative audience and intends to warn Californian citizens of their risk of losing free speech platforms by saying the lawsuit is actually a way to restrict citizens from their access to rights. This is done through an overall educate and activate argument structure, where the authors of the Washington Post highlight the risk of losing rights to free speech while urging Californian citizens to protest against the ban.
The author opens the piece by using a head and heart strategy to signify the risk of Californian citizens losing their freedom of expression if negligence is given to their own behaviors. The opening is accompanied by a large photograph where Meta CEO Mark Zuckerburg can be seen leaving court, surrounded by a swam of camera crew and other citizens. The photograph has a tone that highlights Zuckerburg’s nonchalance in the scene he is surrounded by, to emphasize he is just a businessman who created a platform without any ill intention of harming youth. It positions the audience of right-leaning citizens to see the court jury as an exaggerated situation and shift their focus to the main problem introduced in the opening text. The photograph helps to give the contect of the issue, supported by a fact on the court hearing where “$6 mulluon where given in damaged” to KGM for her social media “addiction”. It allows to emphasize how if citizens keep blaming companies who are running businesses, they risk taking away their own rights — signified through the use of inclusive language by highlighting “our” loss. The overall intended effect is to educate the audience about the main issue and inform them of their stake of losing freedom of speech.