VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Please allow us to introduce…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 70%: Recent debate has arisen over the difficult economic situation in the rural town of Narrow Vally leading to…
Recent debate has arisen over the difficult economic situation in the rural town of Narrow Vally leading to discussion on how to boost dropping visitor counts. In response, The Student Music leadership group of Narrow Vally published a open letter on social media and in the newspaper in addition to displaying them in shops and businesses. In it, The Student Music leadership group enthusiastically and at times passionately contends the benefits that a music festival will bring. Targeting an audience of Narrow Vally locals, the Student Music group encourages locals to attend the initial meeting for discussion.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: analysing argument practice From 2023…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: From the outset, the author employs a largely logical argument to expose the narrow valley community to the…
From the outset, the author employs a largely logical argument to expose the narrow valley community to the ever-growing neglect of the gorgeous gardens festival, in hopes to revitalising the Gorgeous gardens festival
The author begins by establishing hopeful notion through the energetic-driven youth’s approach to music and their values in, ‘we are eager to seize opportunities to bring dynamic and long overdue changes’. This is designed to prime the nostalgic socially-engaged readers to realise the excitement of the new generation’s inclusive nature of rekindling music within the narrow valley community, and are thus more likely to be receptive with the predestined revival of the gorgeous gardens festival. In addition, the author proclaims diversity in the abundance of ‘all encompassing abilities’ ranging from all styles and eras of music in we, ‘celebrate diversity’. In hopes of separating any pre-accustomed divide in the community members’ favoured music styles in an attempt to eventually bring them aboard to ‘sharing [their] endeavours everyday’. Having established a music-driven connection with socially-active readers, the author utilises a series of possible rhetorical comments from community members. Through this strategic ploy, the author portrays the communities active voice to signal to them as being respected, heard and accounted for any concerns.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: ARTICE/TRANSCRIPT OF PODCAST: Hapsey…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: Following a controversial proposal to commercially develop the Hapsey Wetlands, one of the region’s last…
Following a controversial proposal to commercially develop the Hapsey Wetlands, one of the region’s last protected natural sanctuaries, local resident Janelle Tanley responds in episode 32 of her podcast Hapsey Happenings. Tanley contends that the development plan is a destructive intrusion that damages the ecosystems that must remain within the wetlands. Her audience consists of Hapsey residents, environmentalists and everyday listeners of her podcast. Through the use of structural features such as evocative images and descriptive anecdotes, Tanley reinforces her contention. As her tone shifts from reflective to urgent and critical, ultimately, Tanley aims to persuade her audience to resist the development.
Tanley begins her podcast by positioning herself as a credible voice in the argument, identifying herself as a lifelong resident and a host of a personal driven program. This appeal to authority builds trust, furthermore, presenting herself as someone who has experiences the authentic concern for the wetlands. Her use of an anecdote about walking through the wetlands with friends, “softly without disturbing the tranquil surroundings,” creates a peaceful image of the natural wetlands. Tanley’s use of inclusive language “my friends” and “our wetlands,” fosters solidarity with the listening audience, encouraging them to see themselves as custodians of the area. Tanley anchors her argument through evoking shared values of the community, ensuring that she emotionally resonates with her audience in the beginning of episode 32.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: VCAA NHT 2021 English Exam Article
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: In light of the rapid increase in workload expectations of modern society, widespread stress and concern has…
In light of the rapid increase in workload expectations of modern society, widespread stress and
concern has been catalysed amongst workers regarding their current work-life balance. Prompted
by the prevalence of this psychological discomfort, experienced lifestyle coach and university
lecturer in human resources management penned an article entitled Where is the Balance in the
magazine Business for the Future, employing a sombre and then forthright tone to emphasise the
importance of "work-life balance" to his audience of employees and successful business owners
alike. Initially lamenting the conditioning of society to desire a self=oppressive system of excessive
work expectations, Manne proceeds by expounding a plethora of advantages brought by the
implementation of effective work life balance policies. Dispelling any spurious rumours pertaining
to the correlation of increased work with occupational success, Manne offers clarity in the process
of attaining an idealised work life balance, providing a range of suggestions which he ultimately
seeks his audience to endorse.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Construct an argument analysis piece…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: Following the emergence of a potential modernisation of the local, unspoilt Hapsey Wetlands, debate has…
Following the emergence of a potential modernisation of the local, unspoilt Hapsey Wetlands, debate has sparked surrounding a proposed development plan; which aims to commercialise the region for locals, given the potential damages which may coalesce onto the region. More broadly, the matter has raised concern regarding the degree to which governmental bodies should disregard the desires of locals who may oppose such changes. Thus, responding to the controversy in the 32nd episode of her podcast “Hapsey Happenings”, Hapsey resident Janelle Tanley contends that the Nature+Adventure group, whose profit-driven values oppose her own, are purely detrimental to the local area, regardless of the economic benefits which they claim to provide. In this way, she aims to villainise Nature+Adventure group, imploring Hapsey locals -- particularly those who frequent her podcast -- to oppose the changes, with the ultimate intention of halting the group’s future projects to protect nearby regions from also succumbing to their regime.
Initially assuming a moderate and intimate persona to reinforce the personal connection with podcast listeners, Tanley emphasises the intrinsic value which the wetlands provide; for both herself and the wider community who may not as readily recognise its benefits. In doing so, she aims to portray herself as genuine for prioritising the concerns of the Hapsey locals, thus reinforcing her future attacks against the Adventure+Nature group. Her warmth is immediately felt in her opening, particularly in stating the obvious fact that she is indeed “[our] host, Janelle Tanley”. The possessive determiner “your” is especially important in reinforcing her sense of commitment to the Hapsey residents, whilst simultaneously imbuing her podcast with a subtly casual and personal atmosphere only possible through her familiarity to the region. Tanley’s attachment of mystical and healing nomenclature, namely in characterising the wetlands as one of the “the last protected sanctuaries” in the region, serves to also paint Hapsey in a vulnerable manner, thus emphasising its importance beyond merely an ecosystem. Compounded by her employment of an inundative lexicon, labelling the newspaper as “overflowing” and “flooded with letters”, Tanley intensifies the necessity of resisting the changes in hinting at the imminence of the wetland’s modernisation, and consequently the importance of protecting such a landmark. Her tonal switch to one of reminiscence and plea, however, exposing the wetland’s portrayal as “just another area… under threat of destruction” also laments the contrasting views of outsiders, painting them as ignorant through an inability to recognise the wetland’s value. Reaffirmed by her employment of a visual rhetoric, depicting various extracurricular activities against the Hapsey backdrop, Tanley reaffirms that the wetlands serve as a source of connection and community for locals, warning of the societal stratification which would occur from its loss.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: stimulus 1: they won't listen, they…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 90%: The People's Voice My son, I am writing this as I sit under the great boa tree, searching for knowledge only…
The People's Voice
My son,
I am writing this as I sit under the great boa tree, searching for knowledge only our country can give me. I have written and torn this letter up five times, trying to turn a 60,000-year-old story about the strength and power of our people into words.
If you are reading this, my breath has left my lungs, my last footprints have been blown away, and my bones return to country. Do not mistake my silence for absence. My voice, our voice, lives on through you. Our fight is our voice. Do not let it smolder in silence. Let it roar.
Do not be sad in my passing, but carry my torch. The fire of protest, the voice of resistance, is now yours to tend. This voice has echoed since eternity — this fire for which I let blood, sweat, and the broken dreams of your aunties, uncles, and all those who came before you.
I am writing to you as it is up to you now — up to you to commemorate the ashes of the past. Spark the fire and voice of our people in the present. Our voice is heard by all. Our fire cannot be ignored by those in power.
The fire of protest.
First was your grandfather, Jandamarra. For so long his voice was suffocated, his fire nearly extinguished, his once proud open flame smothered as he was captured and tortured by British oppression.
But our fire, our protest, doesn't die.
The power of our people is greater than those in power.
Our fire, our voice, is eternal.
In 1985 we turned against the British, freed our own people, caged like ewes. This was his protest, this was his voice — a voice they couldn't ignore, the voice of protest. That singular act of protest united his people, ignited an inferno so large, so powerful it swept everything in its way.
When you light your fire, when you use your voice, it will unsettle Australia. The crackle of our fire will sink a column that once classed us as flora and fauna. A song that will sear our abductors, our silencers, our oppressors. Stoke our fire so that its embers spread wide across our country — the embers of protest, pride, and power.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: 2025 Enhanced Games
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: Amid the announcement of the Enhanced Games, concern has arisen around the possibility of “clean” athletes…
Amid the announcement of the Enhanced Games, concern has arisen around the possibility of “clean” athletes taking part in the games. In an attempt to uncover the inherent risks involved, sports columnist Darren Kane in his opinion article “Why clean athletes will never be allowed to compete in the doping games” (The Age, 23/5/25), contends that the concept of the Enhanced Games is both dangerous and absurd, targeting both readers of The Age and all high level athletes. Knowing that many readers may be unaware of the dangers of such a concept, Kane transitions from a sarcastic to a scathing tone, arguing that it presents a multitude of health risks, introduces corruption and is not the solution for scientific advancement. With the inclusion of the two images, one depicting the performance enhancing process and the other of the results, Kane illustrates the lack of hard work and dedication that is often synonymous with high level athletes. Ultimately, he articulates the reasoning behind segregation of clean and “juiced” athletes and seeks to encourage readers to apply pressure on the organisation to stop the event from occurring.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Newsletter>Principal’s Message Last…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In a weekly newsletter uploaded to Spire Primary School’s site on 8 July 2017, Principal Denise Walker…
In a weekly newsletter uploaded to Spire Primary School’s site on 8 July 2017, Principal Denise Walker addresses the growing issue of plastic waste, arguing that while the school has taken significant steps towards sustainability, more must be done to tackle excessive packaging. Her piece is accompanied by a comment from Louise, a parent, who pushes back against Walker’s suggestions, criticising them as impractical for modern families. Across the two texts, inclusive language, tonal shifts, visual imagery, and appeals to responsibility are deployed to position parents either towards or against Walker’s vision for a more sustainable school community.
From the outset, Walker establishes context by praising the school’s past initiatives before turning to the pressing issue of plastic packaging. She highlights Spire as “the only local school that has a ‘Walk/Pedal to School Day’ once a week, rather than once a month or even once a term!” The repetition of “once” underscores how the school is already outperforming others, instilling pride in parents and presenting Spire as a community leader in environmental responsibility. Yet, Walker quickly tempers this pride by pointing to the ubiquity of unnecessary packaging: “the newspaper in plastic, hamburgers in boxes, individual packets of tissues, little packages of rice crackers and chips.” This listing overwhelms the reader with examples of excess, shifting their feelings from pride to guilt by highlighting how their everyday consumption contributes to environmental harm. The accompanying image of dull grey landfill piles reinforces this guilt, visually emphasising the bleak future awaiting if waste continues unchecked. By beginning with achievements before turning to failures, Walker carefully guides parents from self-congratulation towards acknowledging that further action is urgently needed.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Background information The Narrow…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: In an open letter published in the local newspaper, shared on social media and displayed in shops across the…
In an open letter published in the local newspaper, shared on social media and displayed in shops across the Narrow Valley region, The Student Music Leadership Group advocates for the establishment of a youth-driven music festival. Framing the decline of the long-running garden festival as evidence of cultural stagnation, the students contend that a new , inclusive festival will revitalise the region. Targeting older residents proud of tradition, families and business owners reliant on tourism, the group uses an enthusiastic, hopeful tone to present generational change as essential for prosperity and renewal.
From the outset, the writers position themselves as energetic, inclusive, and representative of the community’s future. The letter begins by introducing the group as “high-school music students, teachers and mentors” united by passion and diversity, inviting readers to trust their credibility and feel reassured that youth voices are capable of leadership. By stressing that the festival will include “all budding musicians, regardless of age and abilities,” the writers appeal to fairness and community spirit, encouraging the audience to see themselves, or their children reflected in this inclusive vision. The groups reference to thousands of social media followers builds credibility, positioning readers to believe the proposal already has widespread momentum and that they should join in rather than be left behind. Rhetorical questions such as “What about our garden festival? Who doesn’t love a garden?” create a playful yet pointed contrast, nudging readers to reconsider their attachment to the old festival and shift their support towards the new event. Together, these strategies establish the students as credible leaders while framing their proposal as both inclusive and necessary for the community’s cultural future.
The leadership group then shifts their argument to anticipate
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Welcome to Country at the footy is not…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: Debate has recently emerged over the inclusion of Welcome to Country ceremonies at many major sporting…
Debate has recently emerged over the inclusion of Welcome to Country ceremonies at many major sporting events, particularly during the AFL finals, with some critics dismissing them as divisive or unnecessary. Responding in his opinion piece, “Welcome to Country at the footy is not the place to push personal views” (The Age, 19 September 2024), Matthew Stokes, an AFL columnist and former player argues that while Welcome to Country ceremonies should remain a respectful acknowledgment of Indigenous heritage, its increasing frequency and politicisation risk alienating audiences and diluting its cultural power. Writing with the dual authority of his Aboriginal identity and professional sporting career, Stokes employs a reflective yet conversational tone to appeal to both AFL fans and socially progressive Australians concerned with Indigenous affairs. Accompanying the piece are two photographs , one depicting a Welcome to Country ceremony being performed at an AFL game and one of AFL players on the field celebrating, which visually reinforces Stoke’s contention that football should primarily be a unifying spectacle rather than a platform for political expression.
With the central aim of reframing Welcome to Country as a ceremony that should unify rather than divide, Stokes commences his piece by juxtaposing its description as a “beautiful, respectful ceremony” with the claim that it has become “confusing” and “divisive.” By opening with this contrast, he positions readers to reflect on how far the practice has drifted from its original intention and implicitly validates the frustrations of those who feel alienated by its current form. His repeated use of inclusive language that “unites us” and AFL fans together in recognising “our history” appeals to collective identity, positioning the audience to see the ceremony's original purpose as belonging to all Australians. Yet by warning that it is increasingly “overdone” and used to “push agendas,” Stokes employs emotive diction to simulate audience frustration suggesting that the ceremony risks alienating rather connecting. Moreover, his acknowledgement that “many people are confused by its purpose” disarms potential accusations of ignorance, encouraging readers to view their doubts as legitimate rather than prejudiced. This makes the reader more receptive to his critique. Furthermore, Stokes warns that repetition risks diluting the ceremony’s significance, arguing that when it is “overdone” or misused to “push agendas,” it loses the respect it was designed to foster. This reasoning appeals to readers’ sense of cultural preservation, framing his critique as motivated not by hostility but by a genuine desire to protect the ceremony’s value.
Additionally, with the intention of aligning himself with the everyday football fan, Stokes bluntly asserts that “people are not there to watch Welcome to Country, they are there to watch a game of football.” This direct and colloquial phrasing positions the audience to agree with a statement that feels like plain common sense, reframing the objections to the ceremony as practical rather than prejudiced. By drawing on specific examples such as Shannon Ruska’s “rousing” Welcome to Country at the Gabba or Edwin Fejo and Liam Stansfield’s efforts in Darwin, Stokes uses anecdotal evidence to
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: 2023 VCCA Argument analysis
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: In the light of the current issues surrounding the engagement and community action of citizens of Narrow…
In the light of the current issues surrounding the engagement and community action of citizens of Narrow Valley, The Student music leadership group at Narrow Valley highschool vehemently assert a social argument to start a new musical festival targeted at the younger generation of Narrow Valley. Their leadership groups believes in the importance of bringing the community together to establish innovative partnerships and increase prosperity for the Narrow Valley Region can be achieved through starting this new musical festival. Through the use of an encouraging visual highlighting the importance of instruments and music bringing people together, the Narrow Valley leadership team encourage the community to petition strongly to allow the commencement of a music festival. Ultimately, the Narrow Valley leadership team’s broader intent is to drive for community action to occur in the region in order to strive for generational change and start a musical festival that is open to all young people to enjoy and love.
From the outset, the student music leadership team at Narrow Vallley highschool mounts a social argument to establish the importance of celebrating diversity and creativity in the local region through kickstarting a fresh, new festival of music. This is highlighted through the clever use of inclusive language presented through “we” and “our,” being the community of Narrow Valley. The word "We", encourages bringng the audience together, of the progressive youth and the skeptical Narrow valley community. The use of "our passion;" being the community highlights the conjoined belief of youth and concerned broader community to working towards a common goal by calling to action for an exciting new idea for the greater good of the Narrow Valley community. Additionally, the use of rhetorical language, through the leadership team offering a rebuttal, being “disrupting peace” and “corrupting” Narrow valley streets, highlights the cost of the music festival. However, the student leadership team offers the idea that the income of the community is reliant on the music festival, calling to action to the concerned community committee that the festival is the only way to stop the forthcoming economic crisis of the community. Furthermore, the salience of the visual highlights the use of many different looking instruments, being symbolic of the different members of the Narrow Valley community coming together to work towards the improvement of the region. This visual can ignite feelings of belonging for the youth in Narrow Valley community, having a safe space to come together and participate in, and encourage them to call for action to have a Narrow Valley music festival. Thus, the student music leadership team vividly buttress through their social argument the importance of the music festival for the broader community and the positive economical impact and improvement of the Narrow valley region.
Having intimated the importance of the musical festival for the social aspect of the Narrow Valley community, the
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Write an analysis of the ways in which…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 72.5%: Recently, the Olympus high school student representative council have noticed the lack of life skills being…
Recently, the Olympus high school student representative council have noticed the lack of life skills being taught at the high school, and have decided to create a petition for students to sign in order to introduce dedicated life skills classes in the school. in the Open Letter entitled the “Olympus High School representative Council needs your help!”, the student representative council employs a calm yet critical and outraged tone to contend the need for life skills classes at school. The council aims to persuade their Target audience of the Olympus high school students to sign their petition to introduce life skills classes at school
From the outset of the letter, the enthusiastic title stating the council “needs your help!” instantly creates a sense of urgency, and immediately calls for action from strudents, as students at this point are intended to feel a sense of obligation towards the initiative. The sarcastic contrasts between “Pythagoras theorem” and basic life skills such as a “tax return” which is not taught at school amplifies the absurd lack of practical life skills, as the council relates to Olympus high school students who feel disillusioned with the school curriculum. Furthermore, the image depicting shapes with the sarcastic headings thanking “geometry” for helping to “Pay [their shapes” rather than “tax classes” further mocks the prioritisation of complex math skills rather than practical skills, further aligning their views with many students who reflect the same view, Aswell as persuading students who may not agree to question the lack of life skills teaching. The council further aligns their views and values with fellow students by arguing the school should teach the “skills we need to succeed”, which is intended to make students feel represented by the council, who advocate for the students best interest. Additionally, the council reinforces their pre-established sense of support and trust from fellow students by citing the “Australian curriculum” as agreeing with their stance, adding credibility to their stance by using the words of education experts. Finally, by asking the rhetorical question that if “the government recognises” the need for life skills classes, “why doesnt Olympus high?”, inviting fellow students to question the legitimacy of the Olympus High curriculum, whilst implying that life skills classes are an obvious addition to the curriculum, inviting students to support their initiative, and to feel more open to their ideas.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: SECTION C – Argument and persuasive…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: In their open letter to the Narrow Valley community, the Student Music Leadership Group presents a passionate…
In their open letter to the Narrow Valley community, the Student Music Leadership Group presents a passionate case for establishing a youth-led music festival. Through a combination of logical argument, emotive appeals, and vivid imagery, supported by both written and visual language, the students attempt to persuade the local community to support their initiative and recognise the need for generational renewal.
From the outset, the writers position themselves as energetic, inclusive, and representative of the community’s future. The opening line, “We are a growing group of high-school music students, teachers and mentors,” foregrounds both credibility and community engagement. By emphasising diversity – “all budding musicians, regardless of age and abilities, tastes and styles” – the students establish an inclusive ethos, appealing to readers’ sense of fairness and collective identity. The visual presentation of young faces and musical instruments reinforces this positioning, reminding the audience of the vibrancy and enthusiasm of youth.
A central persuasive strategy is the direct comparison between the declining “Gorgeous Gardens Festival” and the proposed music festival. Rhetorical questions such as “What about our garden festival? Who doesn’t love a garden?” create a playful yet pointed contrast. The use of council statistics – “visitor numbers have dropped by 50 per cent over the past five years” – appeals to logic, framing the festival as unsustainable. By likening their proposal to “festival fertiliser” that can “re-germinate interest and energy,” the writers employ metaphor to suggest renewal and growth, thus positioning resistance as synonymous with stagnation and “ending up in the compost bin.”
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Rohappy/Shutterstock Instead of…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: Amidst the controversial decision to ban social media for all kids under 16, public attention has shifted…
Amidst the controversial decision to ban social media for all kids under 16, public attention has shifted towards the effectiveness of this decision. Fighting against it is Amanda Third, a professorial research fellow. She contends that it is ineffective, criticising the decision and remarking “indeed bans may make our children even more vulnerable online.” while arguing that tighter policies will ensure safety for children more effectively. Advocating towards the youth, parents, and policy makers, Amanda’s sharp and critical tone leaves no room for doubt, establishing her point as coherent, decisive and thoughtful, while dismissing all opposing criticism. By presenting her arguments with clarity, Third positions herself as an insightful researcher, demanding the audience’s trust rather than the government’s.
Amanda sets forth a sense of connection with her readers, positioning herself as a caretaker and advisor for the greater community. By using inclusive language like “our” children and “we also need to better align with evidence” Third affirms her care, empathy, while bringing everyone together for a shared effort towards a safer digital space. The inclusive diction frames the debate as a divide between good and evil, squashing any animosity by separating the readers and the policy makers. Doing so, Third promotes her readers’ resilience towards resisting such a policy that may place children at greater risk.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Write an analysis of the ways in which…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In contemporary society, the rise of environmental degradation and increasing concerns around sustainable…
In contemporary society, the rise of environmental degradation and increasing concerns around sustainable practices has caused great public discourse about the need to preserve nature. Following the 2025 Councils Conference in Melbourne, Terry Gee, the Mayor of Western Lakes, delivered a speech to the other mayors that was accompanied by two slides with images. In his speech, Gee assertively argues that banning cars from city centres is not only practical but essential, presenting the change as beneficial to public health, safety, and community wellbeing. With this, his aim is to persuade the other mayors to adopt similar changes to their respective communities’ infrastructure as a means of preserving living standards across the nation.
Opening his argument, Terry Gee optimistically and encouragingly presents the prospect of change as something exciting and innovative, whilst also reminding the mayors about the immense responsibility and duty in their roles. By beginning his argument in such a manner, Gee establishes the sustainable conversion as beneficial from the outset and poses his forthcoming arguments as logical and credible. Throughout the course of the first argument, Gee’s use of inclusive language in “our council” and “our diverse communities”, coupled with the positive connotations of “enriching” and “innovative”, prompts the mayors to consider their active role in determining their community’s future, whilst also framing the change as something that would ultimately improve the community. As such, the mayors are inspired to become more amenable towards Gee’s preceding arguments as the acceptance of the change is positioned as necessary and relevant for their roles. Furthermore, Gee’s declarative sentence “I know you will all listen closely” seeks to evoke a sense of responsibility and accountability in the mayors. With this declaration and direct address of the council audience, the mayors are encouraged to have an open mind and be more receptive towards the proposal as a means of fulfilling their roles on behalf of their communities. Thus, Gee is able to immediately establish a connection with the mayors and increases the chances of his persuasion being successful. Additionally, a cartoon image of a book with two pages— one depicting a sunny, sustainable community with wind turbines and greenery, and the other a polluted wasteland filled with smog and grey buildings — is positioned towards the end of the opening argument. The visual contrast between the healthy, environmentally-friendly page and the depressing, polluted page underscores the idea that the mayors have an important decision to make, and frames the decision to go against the proposal as unfavourable and destructive towards the environment and wider community. In this, Gee reinforces the significance behind the mayors decision and ultimately encourages them to take greater interest in his upcoming arguments in order to help meet the community’s needs.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: The act of violence weakens people’s…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: Witnessing extreme violence and cruelty within the Jewish community causes God’s justice with Eliezer to be in…
Witnessing extreme violence and cruelty within the Jewish community causes God’s justice with Eliezer to be in jeopardy. As a result, his faith does not disappear, but shifts. He begins to question whether God can truly be good if all this suffering is happening. Consequently, violence cripples physical lives and diminishes people's spiritual connections.
Wiesel uses allusions to biblical figures to highlight how violence impacts Eliezer's trust in God. Through these connections, despite the shift in faith, Eliezer uses Scripture to express his frustration with divine power. Additionally, by comparing himself to biblical figures, Eliezer shows the opposite outcome, by questioning the goodness of God. Therefore, this contrast depicts how violence ruptures sacred biblical stories, which turns symbols of faith into doubt.
“Some of the men spoke of God: His mysterious ways, the Sins of the Jewish people, and the redemption, to come. As for me, I had ceased to pray, I concurred with Job! I was not denying His existence, but I doubted His absolute justice.” (Wiesel 45).
During this period, Wiesel alludes to the biblical figure Job, who endured immense suffering despite his faith. In the Bible, Job loses his family, health, and possessions, but remains faithful, reaffirming God’s actions. However, Eliezer links himself to Job, flipping the meaning by doubting His absolute justice. Moreover, Eliezer’s reinterpretation is significant, as it shows how the Holocaust transforms biblical hope into a symbol of spiritual collapse. Conveying this inner dilemma, he acknowledges God’s existence, but Wiesel alludes to how unimaginable pain triggers a shift in God’s relationship.
Eliezer, who once remained silent, begins to openly accuse God of His actions as his faith is tested by the violence he witnesses. His tone of anger turns his relationship with God into an open struggle. Furthermore, there is no longer any doubt, but a confrontation among the cruelties in the camps. Moreover, Eliezer’s lingering doubts about God’s goodness reveal his increasingly complex perception of divine justice. With this, Wiesel illustrates how the decay in faith from violence makes Eliezer lose sight of morality in God.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Stimulus: black and white picture of…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 95%: They cut her hair, but not her courage. They took her body, but not her voice. They buried her, yet she rose…
They cut her hair, but not her courage. They took her body, but not her voice. They buried her, yet she rose again in the chants of thousands.
On the streets of Tehran, the air is heavy with tear gas and hope. Every step forward feels like defiance. Every chant of “Zan. Zendegi. Azadi.” — Women, Life, Freedom — becomes a heartbeat shared by strangers. The regime believes silence can be enforced; we have learned that silence can also roar.
The protest begins in whispers. Mothers telling daughters, sisters telling friends. “Do not be afraid.” It grows in kitchens and classrooms, in late-night messages sent across trembling hands. The simple act of removing a headscarf becomes louder than any speech. These are not the gestures of rebels. They are the gestures of the living, insisting upon life itself.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: write an anaylsis of the ways in which…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: ARGUMENT ANALYSIS~ As the school reopens and continues back to its regular life, after surviving "covid",…
ARGUMENT ANALYSIS~ As the school reopens and continues back to its regular life, after surviving "covid", Langmore secondary college is seen to nominate and elect student representative council members. Consequently, Lucy Lee alumni and past SRC of Langmore secondary, delivered a speech to the school students, in which she provided insight into why students should sign up for SRC. She advocates for students to sign up for SRC to make a positive change towards the school environment. Utilizing a hopeful and optimistic tone, in the hopes that students will sign up, and participate more in the student representation council.
PP1: In the outset, before she forwards her contention, Lee first seeks to imbue her speech admiring "what a pleasure it is to be back at Langmore" using a hopeful and optimistic tone, reminiscing on her times at school as she would "raid to the canteen to be first in line". Lees use of positive connotations, emphasises the honour of speaking to the community, therby reinforcing the schools profoundly postive atmoshere. By sharing this memory, Lee dismantels the formal speaker-audience dynamic, fostering a sense of rapport by postioning herself as a relatable peer. Lee hopes to be able to come across as a relatable speaker, creating that sense of relatability and assurance within the students. Further, Lee develops her piece, moving onto the dark times of covids implication on the
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Practice Analysing Argument Essay 3 –…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 82.5%: Practice Analysing Argument Essay 3 – Shark Article Prompted by the circulation of a horrifying video of a…
Practice Analysing Argument Essay 3 – Shark Article
Prompted by the circulation of a horrifying video of a Shark attack at Sydney Beach, Holly Wainright has composed an opinion piece entitled ‘Today a shark video is playing on every device in the land, dressed up as ‘news’.’ (Sydney Morning Herald 17/2/2022) for an audience of Australians engaged in the domestic media. In a moralising tone, Wainright voices her contempt towards the sharing of the Sydney shark attack video, beckoning her readers to scorn the media for spreading what was perceived as a ‘snuff film’.
With the central aim of criticising digital society for dehumanising the death of a man involved in the Sydney shark attack, Wainright utilises a broad generalisation to imply that filming things is ‘what we do’. By including derogatory references using descriptors such as ‘oblong view’ and ‘black mirrors’ to describe the lens through which society views things, Wainright seeks to draw emphasis on the extent to which the consumption of media through technological devices distorts people’s perception of appalling events. In doing so, she implicitly suggests that this way of living has led to the dehumanisation of perceivably horrifying situations such as the ‘footage of a living, breathing person’s final horrifying moments’. Hence, readers who engage in the media and recognise the influence it has on the way they perceive things are poised to accept Wainright’s critique of digital society. Additionally, with the intent of galvanising an emotional response from her Australian readers, Wainright further draws on her generalisation, by appealing to family values, to assert that ‘the footage from that phone’ is that of ‘someone’s son’ and it ‘was always going to find its way online’. In doing so, her readership of Australians who uphold strong moral beliefs about the role of family in society are positioned to feel sorrow for the family of the man whose footage is all over the internet. Likewise, readers are urged to cynically view the digital media for distressing family values.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Analyse the language in Daylight…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 72.5%: Daylight Saving In response to daylight savings, where clocks move forward one hour in October and then an…
Daylight Saving
In response to daylight savings, where clocks move forward one hour in October and then an hour back in March, a suburban newspaper has written an editorial entitled 'Daylight saving?' targeted at Victorians. The writer has assertively contended that daylight savings is outdated, impractical and damaging therefore should be abolished in Victoria and other Australian States. The piece is accompanied with two images; a photograph of a clock with misplaced number and a cartoon with a caption.
From the outset the author employs a mainly logical argument to demonstrate to socially engaged readers that daylight savings is not for the modern times. Through the historical context provided by the author outlining the need of daylight savings in the wartime they have posed a rhetorical question "Why day light savings never stopped after the first implementation." This encourages Victorians to be aware that day light savings has no long traditions and does not fulfil it's function as outlined prior thus making the readers more likely to be receptive of the author's following arguments, due to their doubts in the practice. Following this, though the author appeals to Victorian's sense of logic by stating that "changing our clocks doesn't conserve electricity" as any offset in the evening just adds to the morning. This has the authorial intent of convincing readers with common sense that allowing readers to reach a conclusion themselves that daylight savings has no benefit at all and therefore is just a pure hindrance as "it's not even succeeding at its main job". Furthermore, the writer appeals to the readers sense of keeping up with modern times by referencing how daylighting savings was originally designed to "conserve fuel and limit energy use" in the war time. This is designed to have Victorians feel that in the present day the practice of day light savings has no use and as “it wasn’t permanently adopted anywhere” readers are guided to view daylight savings as a old technique for conserving energy and thus has no place in the modern world. Overall, The Gawley Gazette aimed to challenge the Victorians traditional beliefs on daylight savings so that they are more acknowledging of later arguments.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Feature Article: Our Future with…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: Our Future with Robots - 2018 NHT With the growing ubiquity of robots and automation in our lives, there has…
Our Future with Robots - 2018 NHT
With the growing ubiquity of robots and automation in our lives, there has been significant debate surrounding the notion of robots coexisting with humans in our everyday lives. In a reproachful yet objective feature article titled: “Our Future with Robots”, a well-known writer on social concerns, John Jones, emphasises that robots and humans cannot coexist because of the capacity for technological innovation to displace humans from their rightful place in society. Targeting the readers of a daily newspaper, the feature article, alongside a visual, aims to encourage readers to demand legislation against robots and automation. In response, Ashley O'Hara published a letter in the newspaper the following day, shedding light on the benefits of AI and discrediting Jones’ argument in a vehement yet rational manner, imploring readers to approach the future with an open mind.
From the outset, Jones appeals to the importance of human autonomy, overlaying a humanitarian argument in which they establish the gravity of the situation, detailing the “problem in the increase of automation in our workplace and homes”. By strategically placing such an argument first, Jones immediately bolsters the dangers of transhumanism, drawing upon the connotations of relentlessness and assault from the word “bombardment”. In doing so, Jones immediately positions the readership to look upon robots and automation with skepticism, since they could pose a threat to human livelihood. Reinforcing this, Jones imbues the audience with a sense of fear through the cold, procedural element of robots “perform[ing] surgical procedures” evoking a mechanistic approach to human wellbeing, unnerving readers by eliminating emotional care from medical treatment. Indeed, by juxtaposing the inhuman characteristics traditionally associated with robots with the hospitality and tenderness experienced during surgery, Jones implies that having faith in robots to enhance our lives and wellbeing could even result in death. Thereafter, Jones briefly acknowledges the potential that robots may have in enhancing our wellbeing, noting that “we all like the idea of a robot cleaning our house for us”. In doing so, Jones bolsters their ethos by portraying themselves as someone who has considered other facets of the debate, appearing as a holistic and objective individual to the newspaper readers in their argument to allay their potential scepticisms against Jones. Jones appeals to the human need for privacy, detailing how robots can “retain and share our later affairs”. Indeed, Jones leverages the forceful and unwelcoming connotations of the word “prying” to suggest that robots have the potential to completely invade our lives and personal details which could lead to unwanted locations. Compounding this, Jones’ extended metaphor, involving the use of “Big Business”, then “science fiction novel come to life” and “Big Robot is watching!”, functions to warn the audience who reads the newspaper and are likely to read widely, about the dystopian threat that faces humanity if we espouse robots into our everyday lives. Evidently, by making an implicit reference to a well-known dystopian novel, Jones’ extended metaphor suggests to the audience that advocating for transhumanist ideals means humanity tending towards dystopia. Hence, Jones elevates the audience’s feelings of fear and apprehension for the future, positioning them to acknowledge the writer’s forthcoming points with greater proclivity.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: In a progressive initiative to amplify…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In a progressive initiative to amplify diversity and innovation within the Narrow Valley community, numerous…
In a progressive initiative to amplify diversity and innovation within the Narrow Valley community, numerous young and avid musicians have contemplated the contemporary expansion of opportunities to showcase musical talent through a music festival. In a primarily ardent and amiable tone, the ‘Student Music Leadership Group’ presents an open letter, complemented with evocative visuals, to be published on various forms of media titled “An open letter to the Narrow Valley community, young and old, who wish to see our region rejuvenated…”. Targeting their audience of pragmatic and visionary citizens from the small rural region, the leadership groups contends that the conduction of a musical event is conducive to a more prosperous and captivating environment and implores the Narrow Valley community to incite change.