VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Write an analysis of the ways in which…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 72.5%: Recently, the Olympus high school student representative council have noticed the lack of life skills being…
Recently, the Olympus high school student representative council have noticed the lack of life skills being taught at the high school, and have decided to create a petition for students to sign in order to introduce dedicated life skills classes in the school. in the Open Letter entitled the “Olympus High School representative Council needs your help!”, the student representative council employs a calm yet critical and outraged tone to contend the need for life skills classes at school. The council aims to persuade their Target audience of the Olympus high school students to sign their petition to introduce life skills classes at school
From the outset of the letter, the enthusiastic title stating the council “needs your help!” instantly creates a sense of urgency, and immediately calls for action from strudents, as students at this point are intended to feel a sense of obligation towards the initiative. The sarcastic contrasts between “Pythagoras theorem” and basic life skills such as a “tax return” which is not taught at school amplifies the absurd lack of practical life skills, as the council relates to Olympus high school students who feel disillusioned with the school curriculum. Furthermore, the image depicting shapes with the sarcastic headings thanking “geometry” for helping to “Pay [their shapes” rather than “tax classes” further mocks the prioritisation of complex math skills rather than practical skills, further aligning their views with many students who reflect the same view, Aswell as persuading students who may not agree to question the lack of life skills teaching. The council further aligns their views and values with fellow students by arguing the school should teach the “skills we need to succeed”, which is intended to make students feel represented by the council, who advocate for the students best interest. Additionally, the council reinforces their pre-established sense of support and trust from fellow students by citing the “Australian curriculum” as agreeing with their stance, adding credibility to their stance by using the words of education experts. Finally, by asking the rhetorical question that if “the government recognises” the need for life skills classes, “why doesnt Olympus high?”, inviting fellow students to question the legitimacy of the Olympus High curriculum, whilst implying that life skills classes are an obvious addition to the curriculum, inviting students to support their initiative, and to feel more open to their ideas.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: SECTION C – Argument and persuasive…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: In their open letter to the Narrow Valley community, the Student Music Leadership Group presents a passionate…
In their open letter to the Narrow Valley community, the Student Music Leadership Group presents a passionate case for establishing a youth-led music festival. Through a combination of logical argument, emotive appeals, and vivid imagery, supported by both written and visual language, the students attempt to persuade the local community to support their initiative and recognise the need for generational renewal.
From the outset, the writers position themselves as energetic, inclusive, and representative of the community’s future. The opening line, “We are a growing group of high-school music students, teachers and mentors,” foregrounds both credibility and community engagement. By emphasising diversity – “all budding musicians, regardless of age and abilities, tastes and styles” – the students establish an inclusive ethos, appealing to readers’ sense of fairness and collective identity. The visual presentation of young faces and musical instruments reinforces this positioning, reminding the audience of the vibrancy and enthusiasm of youth.
A central persuasive strategy is the direct comparison between the declining “Gorgeous Gardens Festival” and the proposed music festival. Rhetorical questions such as “What about our garden festival? Who doesn’t love a garden?” create a playful yet pointed contrast. The use of council statistics – “visitor numbers have dropped by 50 per cent over the past five years” – appeals to logic, framing the festival as unsustainable. By likening their proposal to “festival fertiliser” that can “re-germinate interest and energy,” the writers employ metaphor to suggest renewal and growth, thus positioning resistance as synonymous with stagnation and “ending up in the compost bin.”
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Rohappy/Shutterstock Instead of…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: Amidst the controversial decision to ban social media for all kids under 16, public attention has shifted…
Amidst the controversial decision to ban social media for all kids under 16, public attention has shifted towards the effectiveness of this decision. Fighting against it is Amanda Third, a professorial research fellow. She contends that it is ineffective, criticising the decision and remarking “indeed bans may make our children even more vulnerable online.” while arguing that tighter policies will ensure safety for children more effectively. Advocating towards the youth, parents, and policy makers, Amanda’s sharp and critical tone leaves no room for doubt, establishing her point as coherent, decisive and thoughtful, while dismissing all opposing criticism. By presenting her arguments with clarity, Third positions herself as an insightful researcher, demanding the audience’s trust rather than the government’s.
Amanda sets forth a sense of connection with her readers, positioning herself as a caretaker and advisor for the greater community. By using inclusive language like “our” children and “we also need to better align with evidence” Third affirms her care, empathy, while bringing everyone together for a shared effort towards a safer digital space. The inclusive diction frames the debate as a divide between good and evil, squashing any animosity by separating the readers and the policy makers. Doing so, Third promotes her readers’ resilience towards resisting such a policy that may place children at greater risk.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Write an analysis of the ways in which…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In contemporary society, the rise of environmental degradation and increasing concerns around sustainable…
In contemporary society, the rise of environmental degradation and increasing concerns around sustainable practices has caused great public discourse about the need to preserve nature. Following the 2025 Councils Conference in Melbourne, Terry Gee, the Mayor of Western Lakes, delivered a speech to the other mayors that was accompanied by two slides with images. In his speech, Gee assertively argues that banning cars from city centres is not only practical but essential, presenting the change as beneficial to public health, safety, and community wellbeing. With this, his aim is to persuade the other mayors to adopt similar changes to their respective communities’ infrastructure as a means of preserving living standards across the nation.
Opening his argument, Terry Gee optimistically and encouragingly presents the prospect of change as something exciting and innovative, whilst also reminding the mayors about the immense responsibility and duty in their roles. By beginning his argument in such a manner, Gee establishes the sustainable conversion as beneficial from the outset and poses his forthcoming arguments as logical and credible. Throughout the course of the first argument, Gee’s use of inclusive language in “our council” and “our diverse communities”, coupled with the positive connotations of “enriching” and “innovative”, prompts the mayors to consider their active role in determining their community’s future, whilst also framing the change as something that would ultimately improve the community. As such, the mayors are inspired to become more amenable towards Gee’s preceding arguments as the acceptance of the change is positioned as necessary and relevant for their roles. Furthermore, Gee’s declarative sentence “I know you will all listen closely” seeks to evoke a sense of responsibility and accountability in the mayors. With this declaration and direct address of the council audience, the mayors are encouraged to have an open mind and be more receptive towards the proposal as a means of fulfilling their roles on behalf of their communities. Thus, Gee is able to immediately establish a connection with the mayors and increases the chances of his persuasion being successful. Additionally, a cartoon image of a book with two pages— one depicting a sunny, sustainable community with wind turbines and greenery, and the other a polluted wasteland filled with smog and grey buildings — is positioned towards the end of the opening argument. The visual contrast between the healthy, environmentally-friendly page and the depressing, polluted page underscores the idea that the mayors have an important decision to make, and frames the decision to go against the proposal as unfavourable and destructive towards the environment and wider community. In this, Gee reinforces the significance behind the mayors decision and ultimately encourages them to take greater interest in his upcoming arguments in order to help meet the community’s needs.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: The act of violence weakens people’s…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 80%: Witnessing extreme violence and cruelty within the Jewish community causes God’s justice with Eliezer to be in…
Witnessing extreme violence and cruelty within the Jewish community causes God’s justice with Eliezer to be in jeopardy. As a result, his faith does not disappear, but shifts. He begins to question whether God can truly be good if all this suffering is happening. Consequently, violence cripples physical lives and diminishes people's spiritual connections.
Wiesel uses allusions to biblical figures to highlight how violence impacts Eliezer's trust in God. Through these connections, despite the shift in faith, Eliezer uses Scripture to express his frustration with divine power. Additionally, by comparing himself to biblical figures, Eliezer shows the opposite outcome, by questioning the goodness of God. Therefore, this contrast depicts how violence ruptures sacred biblical stories, which turns symbols of faith into doubt.
“Some of the men spoke of God: His mysterious ways, the Sins of the Jewish people, and the redemption, to come. As for me, I had ceased to pray, I concurred with Job! I was not denying His existence, but I doubted His absolute justice.” (Wiesel 45).
During this period, Wiesel alludes to the biblical figure Job, who endured immense suffering despite his faith. In the Bible, Job loses his family, health, and possessions, but remains faithful, reaffirming God’s actions. However, Eliezer links himself to Job, flipping the meaning by doubting His absolute justice. Moreover, Eliezer’s reinterpretation is significant, as it shows how the Holocaust transforms biblical hope into a symbol of spiritual collapse. Conveying this inner dilemma, he acknowledges God’s existence, but Wiesel alludes to how unimaginable pain triggers a shift in God’s relationship.
Eliezer, who once remained silent, begins to openly accuse God of His actions as his faith is tested by the violence he witnesses. His tone of anger turns his relationship with God into an open struggle. Furthermore, there is no longer any doubt, but a confrontation among the cruelties in the camps. Moreover, Eliezer’s lingering doubts about God’s goodness reveal his increasingly complex perception of divine justice. With this, Wiesel illustrates how the decay in faith from violence makes Eliezer lose sight of morality in God.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Stimulus: black and white picture of…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 95%: They cut her hair, but not her courage. They took her body, but not her voice. They buried her, yet she rose…
They cut her hair, but not her courage. They took her body, but not her voice. They buried her, yet she rose again in the chants of thousands.
On the streets of Tehran, the air is heavy with tear gas and hope. Every step forward feels like defiance. Every chant of “Zan. Zendegi. Azadi.” — Women, Life, Freedom — becomes a heartbeat shared by strangers. The regime believes silence can be enforced; we have learned that silence can also roar.
The protest begins in whispers. Mothers telling daughters, sisters telling friends. “Do not be afraid.” It grows in kitchens and classrooms, in late-night messages sent across trembling hands. The simple act of removing a headscarf becomes louder than any speech. These are not the gestures of rebels. They are the gestures of the living, insisting upon life itself.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: write an anaylsis of the ways in which…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 75%: ARGUMENT ANALYSIS~ As the school reopens and continues back to its regular life, after surviving "covid",…
ARGUMENT ANALYSIS~ As the school reopens and continues back to its regular life, after surviving "covid", Langmore secondary college is seen to nominate and elect student representative council members. Consequently, Lucy Lee alumni and past SRC of Langmore secondary, delivered a speech to the school students, in which she provided insight into why students should sign up for SRC. She advocates for students to sign up for SRC to make a positive change towards the school environment. Utilizing a hopeful and optimistic tone, in the hopes that students will sign up, and participate more in the student representation council.
PP1: In the outset, before she forwards her contention, Lee first seeks to imbue her speech admiring "what a pleasure it is to be back at Langmore" using a hopeful and optimistic tone, reminiscing on her times at school as she would "raid to the canteen to be first in line". Lees use of positive connotations, emphasises the honour of speaking to the community, therby reinforcing the schools profoundly postive atmoshere. By sharing this memory, Lee dismantels the formal speaker-audience dynamic, fostering a sense of rapport by postioning herself as a relatable peer. Lee hopes to be able to come across as a relatable speaker, creating that sense of relatability and assurance within the students. Further, Lee develops her piece, moving onto the dark times of covids implication on the
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Practice Analysing Argument Essay 3 –…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 82.5%: Practice Analysing Argument Essay 3 – Shark Article Prompted by the circulation of a horrifying video of a…
Practice Analysing Argument Essay 3 – Shark Article
Prompted by the circulation of a horrifying video of a Shark attack at Sydney Beach, Holly Wainright has composed an opinion piece entitled ‘Today a shark video is playing on every device in the land, dressed up as ‘news’.’ (Sydney Morning Herald 17/2/2022) for an audience of Australians engaged in the domestic media. In a moralising tone, Wainright voices her contempt towards the sharing of the Sydney shark attack video, beckoning her readers to scorn the media for spreading what was perceived as a ‘snuff film’.
With the central aim of criticising digital society for dehumanising the death of a man involved in the Sydney shark attack, Wainright utilises a broad generalisation to imply that filming things is ‘what we do’. By including derogatory references using descriptors such as ‘oblong view’ and ‘black mirrors’ to describe the lens through which society views things, Wainright seeks to draw emphasis on the extent to which the consumption of media through technological devices distorts people’s perception of appalling events. In doing so, she implicitly suggests that this way of living has led to the dehumanisation of perceivably horrifying situations such as the ‘footage of a living, breathing person’s final horrifying moments’. Hence, readers who engage in the media and recognise the influence it has on the way they perceive things are poised to accept Wainright’s critique of digital society. Additionally, with the intent of galvanising an emotional response from her Australian readers, Wainright further draws on her generalisation, by appealing to family values, to assert that ‘the footage from that phone’ is that of ‘someone’s son’ and it ‘was always going to find its way online’. In doing so, her readership of Australians who uphold strong moral beliefs about the role of family in society are positioned to feel sorrow for the family of the man whose footage is all over the internet. Likewise, readers are urged to cynically view the digital media for distressing family values.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Analyse the language in Daylight…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 72.5%: Daylight Saving In response to daylight savings, where clocks move forward one hour in October and then an…
Daylight Saving
In response to daylight savings, where clocks move forward one hour in October and then an hour back in March, a suburban newspaper has written an editorial entitled 'Daylight saving?' targeted at Victorians. The writer has assertively contended that daylight savings is outdated, impractical and damaging therefore should be abolished in Victoria and other Australian States. The piece is accompanied with two images; a photograph of a clock with misplaced number and a cartoon with a caption.
From the outset the author employs a mainly logical argument to demonstrate to socially engaged readers that daylight savings is not for the modern times. Through the historical context provided by the author outlining the need of daylight savings in the wartime they have posed a rhetorical question "Why day light savings never stopped after the first implementation." This encourages Victorians to be aware that day light savings has no long traditions and does not fulfil it's function as outlined prior thus making the readers more likely to be receptive of the author's following arguments, due to their doubts in the practice. Following this, though the author appeals to Victorian's sense of logic by stating that "changing our clocks doesn't conserve electricity" as any offset in the evening just adds to the morning. This has the authorial intent of convincing readers with common sense that allowing readers to reach a conclusion themselves that daylight savings has no benefit at all and therefore is just a pure hindrance as "it's not even succeeding at its main job". Furthermore, the writer appeals to the readers sense of keeping up with modern times by referencing how daylighting savings was originally designed to "conserve fuel and limit energy use" in the war time. This is designed to have Victorians feel that in the present day the practice of day light savings has no use and as “it wasn’t permanently adopted anywhere” readers are guided to view daylight savings as a old technique for conserving energy and thus has no place in the modern world. Overall, The Gawley Gazette aimed to challenge the Victorians traditional beliefs on daylight savings so that they are more acknowledging of later arguments.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: Feature Article: Our Future with…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 87.5%: Our Future with Robots - 2018 NHT With the growing ubiquity of robots and automation in our lives, there has…
Our Future with Robots - 2018 NHT
With the growing ubiquity of robots and automation in our lives, there has been significant debate surrounding the notion of robots coexisting with humans in our everyday lives. In a reproachful yet objective feature article titled: “Our Future with Robots”, a well-known writer on social concerns, John Jones, emphasises that robots and humans cannot coexist because of the capacity for technological innovation to displace humans from their rightful place in society. Targeting the readers of a daily newspaper, the feature article, alongside a visual, aims to encourage readers to demand legislation against robots and automation. In response, Ashley O'Hara published a letter in the newspaper the following day, shedding light on the benefits of AI and discrediting Jones’ argument in a vehement yet rational manner, imploring readers to approach the future with an open mind.
From the outset, Jones appeals to the importance of human autonomy, overlaying a humanitarian argument in which they establish the gravity of the situation, detailing the “problem in the increase of automation in our workplace and homes”. By strategically placing such an argument first, Jones immediately bolsters the dangers of transhumanism, drawing upon the connotations of relentlessness and assault from the word “bombardment”. In doing so, Jones immediately positions the readership to look upon robots and automation with skepticism, since they could pose a threat to human livelihood. Reinforcing this, Jones imbues the audience with a sense of fear through the cold, procedural element of robots “perform[ing] surgical procedures” evoking a mechanistic approach to human wellbeing, unnerving readers by eliminating emotional care from medical treatment. Indeed, by juxtaposing the inhuman characteristics traditionally associated with robots with the hospitality and tenderness experienced during surgery, Jones implies that having faith in robots to enhance our lives and wellbeing could even result in death. Thereafter, Jones briefly acknowledges the potential that robots may have in enhancing our wellbeing, noting that “we all like the idea of a robot cleaning our house for us”. In doing so, Jones bolsters their ethos by portraying themselves as someone who has considered other facets of the debate, appearing as a holistic and objective individual to the newspaper readers in their argument to allay their potential scepticisms against Jones. Jones appeals to the human need for privacy, detailing how robots can “retain and share our later affairs”. Indeed, Jones leverages the forceful and unwelcoming connotations of the word “prying” to suggest that robots have the potential to completely invade our lives and personal details which could lead to unwanted locations. Compounding this, Jones’ extended metaphor, involving the use of “Big Business”, then “science fiction novel come to life” and “Big Robot is watching!”, functions to warn the audience who reads the newspaper and are likely to read widely, about the dystopian threat that faces humanity if we espouse robots into our everyday lives. Evidently, by making an implicit reference to a well-known dystopian novel, Jones’ extended metaphor suggests to the audience that advocating for transhumanist ideals means humanity tending towards dystopia. Hence, Jones elevates the audience’s feelings of fear and apprehension for the future, positioning them to acknowledge the writer’s forthcoming points with greater proclivity.
VCE · Language Analysis
Language Analysis: In a progressive initiative to amplify…
VCE Language Analysis essay scoring 77.5%: In a progressive initiative to amplify diversity and innovation within the Narrow Valley community, numerous…
In a progressive initiative to amplify diversity and innovation within the Narrow Valley community, numerous young and avid musicians have contemplated the contemporary expansion of opportunities to showcase musical talent through a music festival. In a primarily ardent and amiable tone, the ‘Student Music Leadership Group’ presents an open letter, complemented with evocative visuals, to be published on various forms of media titled “An open letter to the Narrow Valley community, young and old, who wish to see our region rejuvenated…”. Targeting their audience of pragmatic and visionary citizens from the small rural region, the leadership groups contends that the conduction of a musical event is conducive to a more prosperous and captivating environment and implores the Narrow Valley community to incite change.